Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Epston writes about Len's comment. > >>L.E: He didn't say he was separate from the 'thought. " > > He said: " It really doesn´t take a thought to perceive a thought. Thought > >itself cannot perceive,. " Reading skills problem? > > > >Larry Epston > > Perhaps you could clarify what a thought actually is....and who has it. > That may simplify this discussion. > > toombaru L.E: Can you ask another question? One that can be answered. The one you asked is meaningless. There is no answer for it. There are many questions like that. Words without substance, where no answer can be given. Larry Epston > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.