Is There an Inside, a Within?(silver) call her maya

[Guest guest]

if you do, she's going to take you on a magically journey where enlightenment

will be seen for the sham that it is. she is the destroyer of worlds and realms.

(if you don't feed her little friskees your screwed and btw hawkins rates little

friskees the highest of cat foods)

-

ADHHUB

Nisargadatta

Monday, March 06, 2006 10:01 PM

Re: Is There an Inside, a Within?(silver)

 

 

 

So.....Do I have to feed it now or what?

 

 

 

In a message dated 3/6/2006 5:30:31 PM Pacific Standard Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:17:12 -0500

" Fred " <thejman

Re: Is There an Inside, a Within?(silver)

 

that motion your experiencing on your leg is schrödinger's cat rubbing

against you...she says " meow, meow " ..which translated is: thank you for

taking me

out of the indeterminate state (confusion).

-

ADHHUB

Nisargadatta

Monday, March 06, 2006 4:03 PM

Re: Is There an Inside, a Within?(silver)

 

 

 

In a message dated 3/6/2006 4:10:25 AM Pacific Standard Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

Mon, 06 Mar 2006 10:25:50 -0000

" Werner Woehr " <wwoehr

Re: Is There an Inside, a Within?(silver)

 

There appears a thought. There is no experiencer of it. But this

thought says: I am the experiencer.

 

And it goes on, endlessly:

I like, I disike, I think, I see, I hear, I come, I go, I am hungry,

I was sleeping, blah blah blah - all just thoughts, but no doer and

no experiencer and no thinker.

 

Werner

 

 

 

It's a groovy idea, but of course the purpose of such concepts is to expand

beyond the limitations of the concept it replaces, so there's always a

greater

truth than whatever we can conceptualize. What gives us a hint as to how we

 

might find that greater truth is the paradoxes that that show up in the

currently embraced concept.

 

There is no human person with any individual volition that is doing

anything. That's what the concept reveals to egos that imagine they are in

charge of

they're own enlightenment. But experiencing is still occurring, so the

paradox is, how could experience be occurring without an experiencer? Can't

be.

 

'You' are still experiencing. Nothing says you have to be an individual

human in order for this to occur. Experience is occurring. Everything is

consciousness. 'You' are consciousness (Not human consciousness.) 'You' are

experiencing.

 

God is still being put in a box, but maybe the box is a little bigger this

way.

 

Phil