Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Sounds along the lines of Krishnamurti, Werner. As in, the observer is the observed. Bill Nisargadatta , " Werner Woehr " <wwoehr wrote: > > Yes Bill, > > Ultimatively all is Subjective. > > Consciousness is subjective, personal. When one looks at a tree it > seems real but this reality of that tree it is created by a > subjective brain. Therefore the tree represents one's subjectivity. > > All " real " objects are subjective and therefore it is justified to > speak of a objectivity/subjectivity = the object is its subject. > > Werner > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > To me, meaning, profound or otherwise, is assigned: > > We give meaning to our own experiences. Nothing > > objectively means anything. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > But ultimately all is Subjective. > > > > When dissolved into Now what is " objectivity " ? > > > > In a sense What Is/Now is the ultimate objective > > and the ultimate subjective, both. > > > > But then the notion of meaning " as assignment " > > is no more, not in Now. > > > > And consider this: meaning is the complete > > absence of conflict. > > > > What I am getting at is that " deep meaning " > > is not a *property* of something. It is inherent > > in what is Real, in What Is. > > > > > > Bill > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.