Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 On Mar 8, 2006, at 12:34 PM, Nisargadatta wrote: > Message: 15 > Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:52:07 -0000 > " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 > Note on Aphorism 11 of and by Franklin Merrell Wolff > > II ... Within Consciousness-without-an-object > lie both the Universe and Nirvana, > yet to Consciousness-without-an-object > these two are the same. > > Superficially considered, nothing may seem more incomprehensible than > a state of consciousness from which two dissimilar states, such as > the Universe and Nirvana, have the same value. But actually, the > difficulty is not so great when once analysis has led to the > realization that consciousness, as such, is unaffected by > superimposed states or forms. Neither the Nirvani nor the man in the > Universe is outside of Consciousness, as an abstract and universal > principle. If a conception from mathematics may be borrowed, it may > be said that the Universe and Nirvana have the same modulus but are > different in sense. The notions of " modulus " and " sense, " as employed > in mathematics, have the following meaning: In the series of positive > and negative numbers we have an unlimited number of pairs of numbers > having the same absolute magnitude, but of opposite signs. In this > case, it is said that the members of such pairs have the same modulus > but are opposite in sense. Applying this analogy, the modulus that is > common to both the Nirvanic State and to consciousness in the > Universe is the common quality of being Consciousness. The difference > in " sense " refers to the opposed qualities of being objectively > polarized, in the case of consciousness in the Universe, and > subjectively polarized, in the Nirvanic State. Now, when > the " modulus " of a number alone is important, then the positive and > negative " sense " of the number is irrelevant, and therefore, may be > regarded as having the same significance. By applying this analogy, > the meaning of the aphorism should become clearer. > There is a profound Level of Realization wherein the two states of > the Universe of Objects and Nirvana, instead of seeming like forever > separated domains, become interblended coexistences. In other words, > at that Level of Recognition, consciousness of objects and > consciousness of absence of objects are known to be mutually > complementary states, the one dependent upon the other, just as the > notion of negative numbers is dependent upon the notion of positive > numbers, and vice versa. And just as the student of mathematics very > soon reaches the point where the notion of number, as such, > comprehends the positive and negative " sense " of number, so that he > no longer thinks of two distinct domains of number, so, also, is it > at that higher Level of Recognition. Nirvana and the Universe of > objects are simply phases of a more ultimate Reality. P: This guy maybe knows math well, but Buddhist doctrine he doesn't. . Sounds like another advaitin trickster pulling the bunny of Universal Consciousness out of a Buddhist hat. Wink, wink! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.