Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[NonDualPhil] Math, Path

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002@>

wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > In a message dated 3/8/2006 7:43:33 AM Pacific Standard

Time,

> > > > Nisargadatta writes:

> > > >

> > > > Wed, 8 Mar 2006 07:36:02 -0800

> > > > Pete S <pedsie5@>

> > > > Re: [NonDualPhil] Re: Math, Path & Analogies

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On Mar 7, 2006, at 1:25 PM, billrishel wrote:

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >> P: Ok! I know that in arguing about math with you,

> > > > >> I'm getting way over my head. But axioms I can argue

> > > > >> because they just required intuition. Axioms are

> > > > >> math facts that we take as self-evident. All theories

> > > > >

> > > > > B: Axioms are *assumptions*.

> > > > > It is actually a very interesting point that *does* have

> > > > > bearing on nondual philosophy. Careful study of the

> > > > > philosophy of science and mathematics reveals that there

> > > > > are *no* known absolutes. The average person has no idea

> > > > > of this.

> > > > >

> > > > > In mathematics we say: IF a, b, b THEN w, x, y, z, etc.

> > > > > That's a big IF.

> > > >

> > > > P: Yes, Axioms are assumptions, I have not

> > > > disputed that, but some assumptions are correct

> > > > in the sense that they produce useful results, and others

> > > > are not. Yes, again, certain modern scientific theories seem

> > > > to coincide with certain Hindu, and Buddhist's ideas, and

> > > > some try to use such coincidences as proof of all sort

> > > > of mystical nonsense. The rush to certainty and the

> > > > proliferation of fantasy is a powerful temptation for the

> > > > incautious spiritualist.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > B: There is never any verification of any axioms in

> > mathematics.

> > > > >

> > > > > In the history of mathematics this was not fully realized

> > > > > until the time of the non-Euclidean geometries. Prior to

> > > > > that people generally thought that the axioms (in geometry

> > > > > they use the term " postulates " , but is the same thing)

were

> > > > > *true* and defined the inherent nature of space. But then

> > > > > along came some guys that proved there could be a

consistent

> > > > > geometry without the " parallel postulate " . Then along came

> > > > > Riemann who came up with a different non-Euclidean

geometry

> > > > > from the other guys, and which later became fundamental

for

> > > > > Einstein's theory of relativity.

> > > >

> > > > P: Well, since I'm not a mathematician maybe

> > > > we are understanding verification differently.

> > > >

> > > > When I say the results verify the axiom, I'm not referring

> > > > to results as proof of the universal truth of a

> > > > given assumption. I simply mean that such axiom was

> > > > the right one to use for that solution. Like in your

paragraph

> > > > above, if you want to land a rocket on the Moon, you should

> > > > start by assuming space is curved and you should calculate

> > > > your trajectory accordingly. If I assume I have an orange

seed

> > > > in my hand, and what I want is oranges, then getting an

> > > > orange tree after planting it, is my verification that my

> > > > assumption was right. That doesn't say lemon seeds are

> > > > false and orange seeds are right. Walking to the store,

> > > > a straight line is, still, the shortest distance between two

> > > > points. And for such purpose that is still the right axiom.

> > > >

> > > > I'll let the issue rest.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Do you really think such a dry, analytical response is

worthy of

> > the

> > > > insightful mind you've been given?

> > > >

> > > > Phil

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Do you really believe that there exists a 'you' that has been

> > given a mind?

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> >

> >

> > Wouldn´t you rather have a beer?

> >

> > Len

> >

>

>

> Life made me stop using all intoxicants.

>

>

> toombaru

 

 

So how come you talk as if you were intoxicated?

 

len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...