Guest guest Posted March 9, 2006 Report Share Posted March 9, 2006 On Mar 9, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Nisargadatta wrote: > Re: Digest Number 2493 > > > In a message dated 3/8/2006 8:10:10 PM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:53:38 -0800 > Pete S <pedsie5 > Re: Digest Number 2493 > > > On Mar 8, 2006, at 5:15 PM, Nisargadatta wrote: > >> Do you really think such a dry, analytical response is worthy of the >> insightful mind you've been given? >> >> Phil >> > > P: LOL, Phil! What other response do you suggest to a math topic? > > One full of poetry and emotion? I know in theses spiritual lists > mixing emotion, fantasy, and a dash of scientific knowledge > such as quantum physics, string theories, or hologram metaphors > is considered wise, and very New Age, but it is not an aid to > liberation. > > > > > Yup, that's the point. Are you feeling any more liberated after that > discussion? Hehe. > > > P: Liberation is, or is not. It has no degrees. The sense of being an " I " is there, or is not. Are " you " there, Phil? Is this " your " posting 20 posts a day, a need, or just trying to be helpful to others? If you think posting is helpful, is it not the quality that is helpful, and not the quantity? You know all sciences have un-refutable truths, and Economics has this one: The value of goods increases proportionally to their scarcity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2006 Report Share Posted March 9, 2006 Pete: The value of goods increases proportionally > to their scarcity. > Well perhaps you should follow that to its logical conclusion. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.