Guest guest Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 Albert Einstein in the tradition following Enlightenment thinkers INVENTED the relation 'relativity' between space (position) and time (as decription of 'change'). It was very convenient for him to DEFINE space as circular and to see lightspeed as absolute speed. That resulted in 'Science Fiction' like 'Big Bang' and 'Time Travel'. Change doesn't 'need' Time, and seeing lightspeed as limit and explain energy only with mass is looking at 'light' wearing 'rational' sunglasses. Evolution IS Change Abstract thought like rationalism can be seen as Mind Terrorism. Since Enlightenment the most fierce fighter of rational thought was Friedrich Nietzsche He might in this period be seen as the only a really great Western World thinker. Wittgenstein wrote: The goal of philosophy is logical explanation of thoughts. A philosophical work consists of explanations. The result of philosophy is not the writing of 'philosophical' sentences, but the 'enlightenment' of the subject in question. Philosophy should sharply explain thoughts, that remain otherwise hidden and unclear. Tractatus logico-philosophicus (1933) on page 32. I'll try to live up his expectations. Enlightenment started in the Western World the dualist thinking in terms of body and soul (a fantasy dating from the ancient Greek). This rather weird fantasy was made into the logic of rational thinking. 'Rational Thought' then in the Roman Christian World was promoted into semi-absolute ethics. This deviant from unity of body and brain found EVERYWHERE outside the Western World. World History shows that Zoroastrian Christianity (the origininal message of Jesus) didn't distinguish body and mind. Only Mohammedanism was based on Roman Christian thinking as found in Syrian monasteries. As logic the Tractatus gives a clear message: Language is a TRANSLATION of truth, and in itself contains no truth. Nor does language change truth. Any truth is possible and can have many languages. 1. A mind-world is a logical space containing only statements or propositions. All these statements are based on independent basic statements. 2. Every mind-world can split into two or more adjacent mind-worlds around any of its statements. 3. A statement (in any language) is only meaningful for members of some mind-worlds, as a comprehensible mix of adjectives and nouns fit together by verbs. 4.Every statement can be denied 5.The totality of statements in some mind-world is called language 6. Humans can construct languages capable of expressing every statement. 7.A society or super-culture is a group of mind-worlds in which people agree on a set of basic statements (basic commandments or basic constitution). 8.Two adjacent societies can be joined, by agreeing upon a bargaining- language and then on changing the definition of basic words in the two basic constitutions in that language (slightly changing the meaning in order to reach consensus). 9. All real philosophy is 'critique of language', and is aiming at combining two or more closely related societies. 10. " What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence " (Wittgenstein) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.