Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 What is a mistake? What is Nature? What is What? ..........a who which nonaccomplishes? ..........a which which isn't? does some One know the answer? love is the lingering........bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > What is a mistake? > > What is Nature? > > What is What? > > .........a who which nonaccomplishes? > > .........a which which isn't? > > does some One know the answer? > > love is the lingering........bob there are no mistakes everything is exactly like it should be..... means Oneness of all in all the Nature of Oneness is represented...of/from/who/to...what Is Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > What is a mistake? > > > > What is Nature? > > > > What is What? > > > > .........a who which nonaccomplishes? > > > > .........a which which isn't? > > > > does some One know the answer? > > > > love is the lingering........bob > > > > there are no mistakes > > everything is exactly like it should be..... > > means Oneness of all in all > > the Nature of Oneness is represented...of/from/who/to...what Is > > Marc > unconditioned accordance with this statement mark..bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 there are no mistakes everything is exactly like it should be..... means Oneness of all in all L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and refered to as I, agrees. The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I represents, agrees with Marc. The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. Is there anyone else you want to ask? Larry Epston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 In a message dated 3/21/2006 9:38:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:24:13 -0500 epston Re: Re: the nature of mistakes there are no mistakes everything is exactly like it should be..... means Oneness of all in all L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and refered to as I, agrees. The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I represents, agrees with Marc. The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. Is there anyone else you want to ask? Larry Epston Yes, who doesn't agree with Marc's obvious statement, or is this another one sided conversation where nobody noticed that there is nobody to disagree with? Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , epston wrote: > > there are no mistakes > > everything is exactly like it should be..... > > means Oneness of all in all > > L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and refered to as I, agrees. > The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I represents, agrees with Marc. > The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. > Is there anyone else you want to ask? > > Larry Epston > > The enquiry was not posited for the Peanut Gallery. But thank you for your submission youngster. This is heartfelt, as I had been led to believe, by your Other, that you no longer would be reading nor metering the submissions under this query's nom de plume. In appreciation for your having deigned to reply, you are hereby awarded three points...and a silver star for your collection. As to your question. ......What????????? Thanks again, a hero...buffalo bob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/21/2006 9:38:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:24:13 -0500 > epston > Re: Re: the nature of mistakes > > there are no mistakes > > everything is exactly like it should be..... > > means Oneness of all in all > > L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and refered to as I, > agrees. > The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I represents, > agrees with Marc. > The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. > Is there anyone else you want to ask? > > Larry Epston > > > > Yes, who doesn't agree with Marc's obvious statement, or is this another one > sided conversation where nobody noticed that there is nobody to disagree > with? > > Phil > > yep yep yeppers. As you noticed Phil nobody noticed nobody. 2 make a 2 sided sweet nothing out of it : to disagree would be to agree to disagree. That is if that tallies with your own self. personally my own self is 2 1 sided 2 be around anymore.I left it by itself a while ago. If it gets lonely it will be the only one! I gar-en-teez it! bob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 21, 2006 Report Share Posted March 21, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 3/21/2006 9:38:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:24:13 -0500 > > epston@ > > Re: Re: the nature of mistakes > > > > there are no mistakes > > > > everything is exactly like it should be..... > > > > means Oneness of all in all > > > > L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and > refered to as I, > > agrees. > > The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I > represents, > > agrees with Marc. > > The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. > > Is there anyone else you want to ask? > > > > Larry Epston > > > > > > > > Yes, who doesn't agree with Marc's obvious statement, or is this > another one > > sided conversation where nobody noticed that there is nobody to > disagree > > with? > > > > Phil > > > > yep yep yeppers. As you noticed Phil nobody noticed nobody. 2 make > a 2 sided sweet nothing out of it : to disagree would be to agree to > disagree. That is if that tallies with your own self. personally my > own self is 2 1 sided 2 be around anymore.I left it by itself a while > ago. If it gets lonely it will be the only one! I gar-en-teez it! > bob > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Nisargadatta , epston wrote: > > there are no mistakes > > everything is exactly like it should be..... > > means Oneness of all in all > > L.E: I agree with Marc. The human organism named Larry and refered to as I, agrees. > The I that does not exist agrees with Marc. The universe that I represents, agrees with Marc. > The Oneness and Perfection that I am agrees with Marc. > Is there anyone else you want to ask? > > Larry Epston no Larry....there is nobody but " you " ...... " who " reflecte the whole universe ...in the teeth ....which are brushed nicely....again....and again..... Marc > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.