Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 Let's examine the quality of our posts. Excellent ****** Average *** Worthless x By what criteria shall we judge them? " Silver " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 23, 2006 Report Share Posted March 23, 2006 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069 wrote: > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > Excellent ****** > Average *** > Worthless x > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > " Silver " judgment happen already during writing.....it's instantly.....flowing..... there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@> wrote: > > > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > > > Excellent ****** > > Average *** > > Worthless x > > > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > > > " Silver " > > > judgment happen already during writing.....it's > instantly.....flowing..... > > there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody > > Marc ************ Absolutely not. You're right, Marc. Then, why is it people do that? " Silver " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > > > > > Excellent ****** > > > Average *** > > > Worthless x > > > > > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > judgment happen already during writing.....it's > > instantly.....flowing..... > > > > there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody > > > > Marc > > ************ > > Absolutely not. You're right, Marc. Then, why is it people do that? > > " Silver " i remind you that you thought yesterday about a kind of judgement...... you already judged yesterday the posts of the last days as less " quality " .....and more " quantity " ..... you could answer this your question by yourself so Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > > > > > > > Excellent ****** > > > > Average *** > > > > Worthless x > > > > > > > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > > judgment happen already during writing.....it's > > > instantly.....flowing..... > > > > > > there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody > > > > > > Marc > > > > ************ > > > > Absolutely not. You're right, Marc. Then, why is it people do > that? > > > > " Silver " > > > i remind you that you thought yesterday about a kind of > judgement...... > > you already judged yesterday the posts of the last days as > less " quality " .....and more " quantity " ..... > > you could answer this your question by yourself so > > Marc > *************** You missed my point, Marc. I wasn't judging the posts. I was suggesting that we look at their quality rather than worry about how many there are. But then, it occured to me that everyone's perception of the quality of people's posts is unique. That's why I asked the question, " By what criteria shall we judge them? " " Silver " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- 1069 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > > > > > > > > > Excellent ****** > > > > > Average *** > > > > > Worthless x > > > > > > > > > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > > > > > judgment happen already during writing.....it's > > > > instantly.....flowing..... > > > > > > > > there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > ************ > > > > > > Absolutely not. You're right, Marc. Then, why is it people do > > that? > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > i remind you that you thought yesterday about a kind of > > judgement...... > > > > you already judged yesterday the posts of the last days as > > less " quality " .....and more " quantity " ..... > > > > you could answer this your question by yourself so > > > > Marc > > > > *************** > > You missed my point, Marc. I wasn't judging the posts. I was > suggesting that we look at their quality rather than worry about how > many there are. But then, it occured to me that everyone's > perception of the quality of people's posts is unique. That's why I > asked the question, " By what criteria shall we judge them? " > > " Silver " it's only possible to " judge " things......in relation to " rules and laws " ...... " rules and laws " are always " right " ....for a limited duration of time only " rules and laws " are " created " by the mind...... mind is moving....constantly.......wherever, however.....this doesn't matter one could compare even the talks of many (different) Gurus.....in order to judge about their teachings....... one can compare and discuss endless numbers of subjects...... but as long one don't practice oneSelf......for real.....any teachings......then there is no result...or little only This result.....only oneSelf can " know " and feel and live...... there is nobody else " who " could know about This result Marc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 24, 2006 Report Share Posted March 24, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " <dennis_travis33 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dennis_travis33 " > > > > <dennis_travis33@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " > <silver- > > > > > 1069@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Let's examine the quality of our posts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent ****** > > > > > > Average *** > > > > > > Worthless x > > > > > > > > > > > > By what criteria shall we judge them? > > > > > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > judgment happen already during writing.....it's > > > > > instantly.....flowing..... > > > > > > > > > > there is nobody " who " need to judge anybody > > > > > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > > ************ > > > > > > > > Absolutely not. You're right, Marc. Then, why is it people do > > > that? > > > > > > > > " Silver " > > > > > > > > > i remind you that you thought yesterday about a kind of > > > judgement...... > > > > > > you already judged yesterday the posts of the last days as > > > less " quality " .....and more " quantity " ..... > > > > > > you could answer this your question by yourself so > > > > > > Marc > > > > > > > *************** > > > > You missed my point, Marc. I wasn't judging the posts. I was > > suggesting that we look at their quality rather than worry about > how > > many there are. But then, it occured to me that everyone's > > perception of the quality of people's posts is unique. That's why > I > > asked the question, " By what criteria shall we judge them? " > > > > " Silver " > > > it's only possible to " judge " things......in relation to " rules and > laws " ...... > " rules and laws " are always " right " ....for a limited duration of time > only > > " rules and laws " are " created " by the mind...... > mind is moving....constantly.......wherever, however.....this doesn't > matter > > one could compare even the talks of many (different) Gurus.....in > order to judge about their teachings....... > > one can compare and discuss endless numbers of subjects...... > > but as long one don't practice oneSelf......for real.....any > teachings......then there is no result...or little only > > This result.....only oneSelf can " know " and feel and live...... > > there is nobody else " who " could know about This result > > Marc Ps: when This result is fine....then there is nobody " who " need to confirm.......and nobody " expected " to confirm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.