Regarding Epson and the notion of shallowing/Epson

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , epston wrote:

>

> L.E: I appreciate your good intensions but there is and can be pain

> in the present, just no suffering.

> > Pain is physical. Suffering is emotional. You cannot suffer and be

> in the present so when there is an experience of emotional hurt you

> suffer until it subsides enough to again have the possibility of

> existing in or entering the present. IMHO.

> >

> > Larry Epston

>

> well that was shallow

>

> L.E: Perhaps you see what is deep as shallow and what is shallow as

deep as part of your general confusion.

>

> Larry

 

At first i thought you had written something like " maybe eric for you

what is deep or what is shallow has significance... " and i had a stop,

i thought " shit this guy is deep " , then i read again and saw what you

really had written and i thought:

" well that was shallow "

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

<ericparoissien wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

> >

> > L.E: I appreciate your good intensions but there is and can be

pain

> > in the present, just no suffering.

> > > Pain is physical. Suffering is emotional. You cannot suffer

and be

> > in the present so when there is an experience of emotional hurt

you

> > suffer until it subsides enough to again have the possibility of

> > existing in or entering the present. IMHO.

> > >

> > > Larry Epston

> >

> > well that was shallow

> >

> > L.E: Perhaps you see what is deep as shallow and what is shallow

as

> deep as part of your general confusion.

> >

> > Larry

>

> At first i thought you had written something like " maybe eric for

you

> what is deep or what is shallow has significance... " and i had a

stop,

> i thought " shit this guy is deep " , then i read again and saw what

you

> really had written and i thought:

> " well that was shallow "

>

Watch out Eric! Larrald might puke his guts out and shit his pants

in. That may seem odd and unusual to most people, but L.E. has

mentioned his proclivity for both issuances as sort of a natural

habit he has when he gets upset about something or other. Call it an

infantile syndrome ot call it just being Larry? Turn the other cheek

and he may fart in his own face.......bob

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

<ericparoissien wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

> >

> > L.E: I appreciate your good intensions but there is and can be pain

> > in the present, just no suffering.

> > > Pain is physical. Suffering is emotional. You cannot suffer and be

> > in the present so when there is an experience of emotional hurt you

> > suffer until it subsides enough to again have the possibility of

> > existing in or entering the present. IMHO.

> > >

> > > Larry Epston

> >

> > well that was shallow

> >

> > L.E: Perhaps you see what is deep as shallow and what is shallow as

> deep as part of your general confusion.

> >

> > Larry

>

> At first i thought you had written something like " maybe eric for you

> what is deep or what is shallow has significance... " and i had a stop,

> i thought " shit this guy is deep " , then i read again and saw what you

> really had written and i thought:

> " well that was shallow "

>

 

why the name-calling?

does it serve?

 

if words do not lift up, then either they do nothing (shallow?),

or they bring down.

 

 

Bill

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Eric Paroissien "

> <ericparoissien@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

> > >

> > > L.E: I appreciate your good intensions but there is and can be pain

> > > in the present, just no suffering.

> > > > Pain is physical. Suffering is emotional. You cannot suffer

and be

> > > in the present so when there is an experience of emotional hurt you

> > > suffer until it subsides enough to again have the possibility of

> > > existing in or entering the present. IMHO.

> > > >

> > > > Larry Epston

> > >

> > > well that was shallow

> > >

> > > L.E: Perhaps you see what is deep as shallow and what is shallow as

> > deep as part of your general confusion.

> > >

> > > Larry

> >

> > At first i thought you had written something like " maybe eric for you

> > what is deep or what is shallow has significance... " and i had a stop,

> > i thought " shit this guy is deep " , then i read again and saw what you

> > really had written and i thought:

> > " well that was shallow "

> >

>

> why the name-calling?

> does it serve?

>

> if words do not lift up, then either they do nothing (shallow?),

> or they bring down.

>

>

> Bill

>

 

 

a wise remark