Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Happy Daze Compiled

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes ownership.

 

The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

 

In truth there is no such thing as mind.

 

Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

 

There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

 

There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges concurrently

with the dream of

separation.

 

Conceptualization is illusory separation.

 

The contents of mind are hidden but present.

Mind is its contents.

........a bucket of shadows.

 

toombaru

 

P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

all that, and of its implications? And the last

metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

stroke.

 

ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

> The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes ownership.

>

> The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

>

> In truth there is no such thing as mind.

>

> Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

>

> There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

>

> There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges concurrently

> with the dream of

> separation.

>

> Conceptualization is illusory separation.

>

> The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> Mind is its contents.

> .......a bucket of shadows.

>

> toombaru

>

> P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> all that, and of its implications? And the last

> metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> stroke.

>

> ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

>

 

 

 

If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia.

 

She rides a wild mustang you know.

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

ownership.

> >

> > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> >

> > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> >

> > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> >

> > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> >

> > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

concurrently

> > with the dream of

> > separation.

> >

> > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> >

> > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > Mind is its contents.

> > .......a bucket of shadows.

> >

> > toombaru

> >

> > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > stroke.

> >

> > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> >

>

>

>

> If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia.

>

> She rides a wild mustang you know.

>

>

>

> toombaru

>

 

Downstream = something flowing (concepts?)

 

" I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts

 

Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " .

 

But there is no such thing as " mind " .

 

Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing.

 

But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not.

 

The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not.

 

From this thinking of thoughts which are not,

 

" I " who am not,

 

assumes ownership of naught.

 

I am Poor in Spirit indeed.

 

Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow

 

Therefore no bucket there be

 

to contain shadows of me

 

or no one knowing naught of this nothing.

 

You see?

 

 

please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought

not to anyway.

 

...........bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> ownership.

> > >

> > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > >

> > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > >

> > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > >

> > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > >

> > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

> concurrently

> > > with the dream of

> > > separation.

> > >

> > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > >

> > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > Mind is its contents.

> > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > stroke.

> > >

> > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia.

> >

> > She rides a wild mustang you know.

> >

> >

> >

> > toombaru

> >

>

> Downstream = something flowing (concepts?)

>

> " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts

>

> Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " .

>

> But there is no such thing as " mind " .

>

> Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing.

>

> But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not.

>

> The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not.

>

> From this thinking of thoughts which are not,

>

> " I " who am not,

>

> assumes ownership of naught.

>

> I am Poor in Spirit indeed.

>

> Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow

>

> Therefore no bucket there be

>

> to contain shadows of me

>

> or no one knowing naught of this nothing.

>

> You see?

>

>

> please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought

> not to anyway.

>

> ...........bob

>

 

 

 

 

All the sages tell us............There is......nothing.

 

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

ownership.

> >

> > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> >

> > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> >

> > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> >

> > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> >

> > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

concurrently

> > with the dream of

> > separation.

> >

> > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> >

> > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > Mind is its contents.

> > .......a bucket of shadows.

> >

> > toombaru

> >

> > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > stroke.

> >

> > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> >

>

>

>

> The oddest of the odd:

>

> Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity.

>

>

>

> toombaru

>

How true toombaru. And odder than odd: this vacuity is the only

thing there be that can suck and blow at the same time.(in a time

which is not).....bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> > ownership.

> > > >

> > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > > >

> > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > > >

> > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > > >

> > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > > >

> > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

> > concurrently

> > > > with the dream of

> > > > separation.

> > > >

> > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > > >

> > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > > Mind is its contents.

> > > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > > >

> > > > toombaru

> > > >

> > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > > stroke.

> > > >

> > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to

Patricia.

> > >

> > > She rides a wild mustang you know.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> >

> > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?)

> >

> > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts

> >

> > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " .

> >

> > But there is no such thing as " mind " .

> >

> > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing.

> >

> > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not.

> >

> > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not.

> >

> > From this thinking of thoughts which are not,

> >

> > " I " who am not,

> >

> > assumes ownership of naught.

> >

> > I am Poor in Spirit indeed.

> >

> > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow

> >

> > Therefore no bucket there be

> >

> > to contain shadows of me

> >

> > or no one knowing naught of this nothing.

> >

> > You see?

> >

> >

> > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught.

Ought

> > not to anyway.

> >

> > ...........bob

> >

>

>

>

>

> All the sages tell us............There is......nothing.

>

>

>

> toombaru

>

It is that it is

and it's nothing.

..... I bow.

 

bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> ownership.

> > >

> > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > >

> > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > >

> > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > >

> > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > >

> > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

> concurrently

> > > with the dream of

> > > separation.

> > >

> > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > >

> > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > Mind is its contents.

> > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > stroke.

> > >

> > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> > The oddest of the odd:

> >

> > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity.

> >

> >

> >

> > toombaru

> >

> How true toombaru. And odder than odd: this vacuity is the only

> thing there be that can suck and blow at the same time.(in a time

> which is not).....bob

>

 

 

" IT " gets curiouser and curiouser.

 

 

toombaru

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> > > ownership.

> > > > >

> > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > > > >

> > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > > > >

> > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > > > >

> > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > > > >

> > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

> > > concurrently

> > > > > with the dream of

> > > > > separation.

> > > > >

> > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > > > >

> > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > > > Mind is its contents.

> > > > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > > > >

> > > > > toombaru

> > > > >

> > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > > > stroke.

> > > > >

> > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to

> Patricia.

> > > >

> > > > She rides a wild mustang you know.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > toombaru

> > > >

> > >

> > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?)

> > >

> > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts

> > >

> > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " .

> > >

> > > But there is no such thing as " mind " .

> > >

> > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing.

> > >

> > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not.

> > >

> > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not.

> > >

> > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not,

> > >

> > > " I " who am not,

> > >

> > > assumes ownership of naught.

> > >

> > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed.

> > >

> > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow

> > >

> > > Therefore no bucket there be

> > >

> > > to contain shadows of me

> > >

> > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing.

> > >

> > > You see?

> > >

> > >

> > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught.

> Ought

> > > not to anyway.

> > >

> > > ...........bob

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing.

> >

> >

> >

> > toombaru

> >

> It is that it is

> and it's nothing.

> ..... I bow.

>

> bob

>

 

 

 

...............not a leaf stirs......in strawberry canyon...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> > ownership.

> > > >

> > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > > >

> > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > > >

> > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > > >

> > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > > >

> > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges

> > concurrently

> > > > with the dream of

> > > > separation.

> > > >

> > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > > >

> > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > > Mind is its contents.

> > > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > > >

> > > > toombaru

> > > >

> > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > > stroke.

> > > >

> > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > The oddest of the odd:

> > >

> > > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> > How true toombaru. And odder than odd: this vacuity is the only

> > thing there be that can suck and blow at the same time.(in a time

> > which is not).....bob

> >

>

>

> " IT " gets curiouser and curiouser.

>

>

> toombaru

>

And who'd of thought?

 

....bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote:

>

> The oddest of the odd:

>

> Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity.

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

> or is it vacuity cognizing mind?

>

 

 

 

this is where rumi says:

 

'ahhhhhh but hush................words can take us no further...............'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 "

<lastrain@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@>

wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes

> > > > ownership.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that

emerges

> > > > concurrently

> > > > > > with the dream of

> > > > > > separation.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present.

> > > > > > Mind is its contents.

> > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > toombaru

> > > > > >

> > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said

> > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last

> > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's

> > > > > > stroke.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you

> > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. ;)

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to

> > Patricia.

> > > > >

> > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > toombaru

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?)

> > > >

> > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts

> > > >

> > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " .

> > > >

> > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " .

> > > >

> > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing.

> > > >

> > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not.

> > > >

> > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not.

> > > >

> > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not,

> > > >

> > > > " I " who am not,

> > > >

> > > > assumes ownership of naught.

> > > >

> > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed.

> > > >

> > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow

> > > >

> > > > Therefore no bucket there be

> > > >

> > > > to contain shadows of me

> > > >

> > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing.

> > > >

> > > > You see?

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught.

> > Ought

> > > > not to anyway.

> > > >

> > > > ...........bob

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> > It is that it is

> > and it's nothing.

> > ..... I bow.

> >

> > bob

> >

>

>

>

> ..............not a leaf stirs......in strawberry canyon...........

>

no wave ripples on howling Lake Erie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote:

> >

> > The oddest of the odd:

> >

> > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity.

> >

> > ~~~~~~~~~

> >

> > or is it vacuity cognizing mind?

> >

>

>

>

> this is where rumi says:

>

> 'ahhhhhh but hush................words can take us no

further...............'

>

Im left speechless........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...