Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Share Posted March 29, 2006 Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > T: The oddest of the odd: > > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity. > > ~~~~~~~~~ > > B: or is it vacuity cognizing mind? > > P: Or... is it just... simply ...cognizance. > Bob: r u cognizant of this?......bn P; Not ME! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Share Posted March 29, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > The oddest of the odd: > > > > > > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > or is it vacuity cognizing mind? > > > > > > > > > > > this is where rumi says: > > > > 'ahhhhhh but hush................words can take us no > further...............' > > > Im left speechless........ > LOL! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2006 Report Share Posted March 29, 2006 In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 " toombaru2006 " <lastrain Re: Happy Daze Compiled Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > ownership. > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > concurrently > > > with the dream of > > > separation. > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > Mind is its contents. > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > stroke. > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > " I " who am not, > > assumes ownership of naught. > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > Therefore no bucket there be > > to contain shadows of me > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > You see? > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > not to anyway. > > ...........bob > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. toombaru Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > ownership. > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > concurrently > > > > with the dream of > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > You see? > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > not to anyway. > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > toombaru > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > Phil > > Significance to whom? toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > ownership. > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > concurrently > > > > with the dream of > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > You see? > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > not to anyway. > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > toombaru > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > Phil > " Nothing " is not information. And there is no information " about " Nothing. Nothing is when all the information has fallen away. It is the ultimate nakeness. Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > ownership. > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > concurrently > > > > with the dream of > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > You see? > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > not to anyway. > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > toombaru > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > Phil > > There is significance to this thought, though you may not understand it. I don't understand it. I don't understand this either. I don't understand my not understanding.That's significant. Undertand? .......bob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 In a message dated 3/30/2006 4:01:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadat ta writes: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:14:37 -0000 " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 Re: Happy Daze Compiled Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > ownership. > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > concurrently > > > > with the dream of > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > You see? > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > not to anyway. > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > toombaru > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > Phil > > There is significance to this thought, though you may not understand it. I don't understand it. I don't understand this either. I don't understand my not understanding.That's significant. Undertand? ........bob Hehe............Not usually, but I enjoy you anyway. Maybe the question was slightly less philosophical. The mind of an enlightened master is not enlightened. If that which claims you don't exist is correct, it also doesn't exist, and therefore the claim has no significance. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/30/2006 4:01:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadat > ta writes: > > Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:14:37 -0000 > " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > > concurrently > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to > Patricia. > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. > Ought > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > nothingness? > > > > Phil > > > > There is significance to this thought, though you may not > understand it. I don't understand it. I don't understand this either. > I don't understand my not understanding.That's significant. Undertand? > .......bob > > > > > Hehe............Not usually, but I enjoy you anyway. > Maybe the question was slightly less philosophical. The mind of an > enlightened master is not enlightened. If that which claims you don't exist is > correct, it also doesn't exist, and therefore the claim has no significance. > > Phil > > Gotcha now Phil. Now I'm enlightened without any significance whatsoever.....but it really doesn't add up to much when you are a ciper like me. ;-)) .....................bob the NonExistant > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote: > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > > concurrently > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > toombaru > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance ....bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > > > concurrently > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. > Ought > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > nothingness? > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > toombaru > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > ....bob > and no whom too ....bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard > Time, > > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that > emerges > > > > > concurrently > > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to > > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little > naught. > > Ought > > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > > nothingness? > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > > ....bob > > > and no whom too > ....bob > and no to whom to..too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard > > Time, > > > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and > assumes > > > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that > > emerges > > > > > > concurrently > > > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to > > > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is > Not. > > > > > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little > > naught. > > > Ought > > > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > > > nothingness? > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > > > ....bob > > > > > and no whom too > > ....bob > > > and no to whom to..too > WAIT! that's: no to whom to too toombaru. I've got the scent of a tune here too! .....bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 In a message dated 3/31/2006 8:18:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 07:31:06 -0000 " toombaru2006 " <lastrain Re: Happy Daze Compiled Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > ownership. > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > concurrently > > > > with the dream of > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to Patricia. > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > You see? > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. Ought > > not to anyway. > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > toombaru > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your nothingness? > > Phil > > Significance to whom? toombaru There's a " whom " ?..........Show me this " whom " . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 In a message dated 3/31/2006 8:18:18 AM Pacific Standard Time, Nisargadatta writes: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 15:59:39 -0000 " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 Re: Happy Daze Compiled Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard Time, > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and assumes > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated thought > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that emerges > > > > concurrently > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you to > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is Not. > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little naught. > Ought > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > nothingness? > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > toombaru > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > ....bob > and no whom too .....bob Hehe. Great non-minds non-think alike. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard > > > Time, > > > > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and > > assumes > > > > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated > thought > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that > > > emerges > > > > > > > concurrently > > > > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you > to > > > > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that is > > Not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little > > > naught. > > > > Ought > > > > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > > > > nothingness? > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > > > > ....bob > > > > > > > and no whom too > > > ....bob > > > > > and no to whom to..too > > > WAIT! that's: no to whom to too toombaru. > > I've got the scent of a tune here too! > .....bob > I can see the dancers in their little tu tus in this ballet: " No to whom to too toombaru " .......Lights..Action...Curtain! .......bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > <lastrain@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific Standard > > > > Time, > > > > > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > > > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S > <pedsie5@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and > > > assumes > > > > > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated > > thought > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual flowingness......that > > > > emerges > > > > > > > > concurrently > > > > > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for you > > > > > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce you > > to > > > > > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing that > is > > > Not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this little > > > > naught. > > > > > Ought > > > > > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of your > > > > > nothingness? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > > > > > ....bob > > > > > > > > > and no whom too > > > > ....bob > > > > > > > and no to whom to..too > > > > > WAIT! that's: no to whom to too toombaru. > > > > I've got the scent of a tune here too! > > .....bob > > > I can see the dancers in their little tu tus > in this ballet: " No to whom to too toombaru " > > .......Lights..Action...Curtain! > > .......bob > Wait..wait a minute.. we could have a Reprise too: " No to whom to too toombaru:II " ..and two little girls swirls in their two tu tus too! .........bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2006 Report Share Posted April 1, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 3/29/2006 10:01:30 AM Pacific > Standard > > > > > Time, > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wed, 29 Mar 2006 17:48:59 -0000 > > > > > > > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > > > > > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > > > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " > > > > > > <lastrain@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S > > <pedsie5@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " emerges downstream from the thinking and > > > > assumes > > > > > > > > > ownership. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The " I " calls the conceptual flow " mind'. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In truth there is no such thing as mind. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts cannot 'see' other thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no such thing as a separate...isolated > > > thought > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is only the conceptual > flowingness......that > > > > > emerges > > > > > > > > > concurrently > > > > > > > > > > > with the dream of > > > > > > > > > > > separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptualization is illusory separation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The contents of mind are hidden but present. > > > > > > > > > > > Mind is its contents. > > > > > > > > > > > .......a bucket of shadows. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > P: Exquisite, Toom, are you aware you said > > > > > > > > > > > all that, and of its implications? And the last > > > > > > > > > > > metaphor, was... again, exquisite, a master's > > > > > > > > > > > stroke. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ps: this is just a sample of what I can do for > you > > > > > > > > > > > as your PR man, for a modest monthly fee, of > > > course. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you come to Cambria..........I will introduce > you > > > to > > > > > > Patricia. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She rides a wild mustang you know. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Downstream = something flowing (concepts?) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " jumps up from this streaming flow of concepts > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Conceptual Flowing = " mind " according to " I " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But there is no such thing as " mind " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore there is no conceptual Flowing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But somehow " I " emerge from a conceptual flowing > that > > is > > > > Not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The illusory " I " has 'thoughts' which are not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From this thinking of thoughts which are not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " I " who am not, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > assumes ownership of naught. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am Poor in Spirit indeed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed am I...and Wholely Holy Hollow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Therefore no bucket there be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to contain shadows of me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > or no one knowing naught of this nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You see? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > please don't take a thirty aught to shoot this > little > > > > > naught. > > > > > > Ought > > > > > > > > > not to anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All the sages tell us............There > is......nothing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there significance to a nothing informing you of > your > > > > > > nothingness? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Significance to whom? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > toombaru > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Whom It May Concern: No Significance > > > > > > ....bob > > > > > > > > > > > and no whom too > > > > > ....bob > > > > > > > > > and no to whom to..too > > > > > > > WAIT! that's: no to whom to too toombaru. > > > > > > I've got the scent of a tune here too! > > > .....bob > > > > > I can see the dancers in their little tu tus > > in this ballet: " No to whom to too toombaru " > > > > .......Lights..Action...Curtain! > > > > .......bob > > > Wait..wait a minute.. we could have a Reprise too: > " No to whom to too toombaru:II " > ..and two little girls swirls in their two tu tus too! > > .........bob > Happy Daze in Phase II......... Laissez les bons temps roulez! (or:let's Rock and Roll) ..........bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.