Guest guest Posted March 30, 2006 Report Share Posted March 30, 2006 < Do you 'see' this in consciousness, Michael? I ask because it's very much < like what I 'see'. < That which consciousness 'creates' with it's focus of Self cannot help but < be identified with, eh? It literally IS the Self, and so identification is < also spontaneous and inevitable until such 'time' that these " distinctions " < dissipate. < Phil If I follow you correctly, it's more of a *sense* or *feel* to me. Sort of like observing a pot of water boil. All that movement but the *whole thing* (if you will) isn't going anywhere. As J. Krishnamurti put it once, " There is movement in the mind but not of the mind. " Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Adamson " <adamson wrote: > > > > > < Do you 'see' this in consciousness, Michael? I ask because it's very > much > < like what I 'see'. > < That which consciousness 'creates' with it's focus of Self cannot > help but > < be identified with, eh? It literally IS the Self, and so > identification is > < also spontaneous and inevitable until such 'time' that these > " distinctions " > < dissipate. > > < Phil > > If I follow you correctly, it's more of a *sense* or *feel* to me. Sort > of like observing a pot of water boil. All that movement but the *whole > thing* (if you will) isn't going anywhere. As J. Krishnamurti put it > once, " There is movement in the mind but not of the mind. " > > Michael ******** Krishnamurti's mind moves more than mine. " Silver " ******** > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.