Guest guest Posted March 31, 2006 Report Share Posted March 31, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver- > 1069@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Re: Happy Daze Compiled > > > > > > > > > > T: The oddest of the odd: > > > > > > > > > > Mind is able to cognize its own vacuity. > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > > > > > B: or is it vacuity cognizing mind? > > > > > > > > > > P: Or... is it just... simply ...cognizance. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Funny you say that... > > > > > > > > After writing my little comment, and just before > > > > slipping into a nap, I was reflecting on how with > > > > the phrase " mind cognizing vacuity " or " vacuity > > > > cognizing mind " -- either one -- there is a verb > > > > in the middle and a noun on either end. I trust > > > > the verb more than the nouns. > > > > > > > > I was recently reading a far-out paper on " conceptual > > > > modeling " (re software) and this particular author > > > > is very deep. He was bringing in philosophy, even > > > > mentioning Wittgenstein. > > > > > > > > At one point he said that he noticed that different > > > > information modelers seemed to be trying to get > > > > down to the " atom " of stuff, and to then build up > > > > from that. But finding the right atoms always seemed > > > > kinda quirky. He noticed that whatever atoms one came > > > > up with, those atoms always ended up having different > > > > *behaviors*. So then he realized that behavior was > > > > more fundamental than " things " . > > > > > > > > Kinda cool, huh? > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > This is cool stuff Bill. I had always learned that subjects came > > > before verbs, and objects came after verbs.. in the English > > language > > > way of constructing things. Now we know verbs come first and then > > > subjects and objects come later. " In the Beginning was the Verb > > and > > > the Verb was with..... " Oh well I'm trying to get it..I'm an > > > abecedarian in this whole new field. LOL.....bob > > > > ********** > > > > That's funny. I'm an abcdefarian. > > > > :-P > > > > " Silver " > > > > > Hi silver..what's a abcdefarian? sound almost like an abcessed > tooth. An abecedarian is a neophyte, as begginer if you will.Someone > learning the rudiments of something or other. But I never heard of an > abcdefarian before.....bob ********* Neither did I until I made it up last night. Hehe. " Silver " ********* > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.