Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 L.E: How can you hang your hat on the Eternal, Len. It has no handles or > coathooks. If you are naked there, there is no one to see you because you are >the only one that exists. > >Larry Epston Eternal is a construct, very suitable for hanging hats on. len Are you serious? Phil L.E: Since we use written symbols to communicate, anything that is written or even spoken is a " construct " or " concept. " When this is rebuked, no more communication is possible as one person sits in judgement of the other, defining all that is said or written as a " construct " or " concept. " In that sense, their criticism is also a " construct " or " concept. " And we have a viscious circle or closed system that just goes round and round. The basic engine behind this kind of verbal superiority is ego arrogance, where one person assumes the role of all-knowing and the other as ignorant of the truth. It seem that this is the case here, in this dialogue. Larry Epston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 Nisargadatta , epston wrote: > > L.E: How can you hang your hat on the Eternal, Len. It has no > handles or > > coathooks. If you are naked there, there is no one to see you > because you are > >the only one that exists. > > > >Larry Epston > > Eternal is a construct, very suitable for hanging hats on. > > len > > > Are you serious? > > Phil > > > > L.E: Since we use written symbols to communicate, anything that is written or > even spoken is a " construct " or " concept. " When this is rebuked, no more > communication is possible as one person sits in judgement of the other, defining > all that is said or written as a " construct " or " concept. " In that sense, > their criticism is also a " construct " or " concept. " And we have a viscious > circle or closed system that just goes round and round. The basic engine behind > this kind of verbal superiority is ego arrogance, where one person assumes the > role of all-knowing and the other as ignorant of the truth. It seem that this > is the case here, in this dialogue. > > Larry Epston No Larry, not every word is a construct. It's a symbol. It can be used to communicate about real things, but most of the time on this kind of sites it is being used for communicating ones illusions. That's when it becomes a construct. Len Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2006 Report Share Posted April 2, 2006 In a message dated 4/2/2006 5:05:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Nisargadatta writes: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 07:51:21 EDT epston Re: The Uimate Nakedness L.E: How can you hang your hat on the Eternal, Len. It has no handles or > coathooks. If you are naked there, there is no one to see you because you are >the only one that exists. > >Larry Epston Eternal is a construct, very suitable for hanging hats on. len Are you serious? Phil L.E: Since we use written symbols to communicate, anything that is written or even spoken is a " construct " or " concept. " When this is rebuked, no more communication is possible as one person sits in judgement of the other, defining all that is said or written as a " construct " or " concept. " In that sense, their criticism is also a " construct " or " concept. " And we have a viscious circle or closed system that just goes round and round. The basic engine behind this kind of verbal superiority is ego arrogance, where one person assumes the role of all-knowing and the other as ignorant of the truth. It seem that this is the case here, in this dialogue. Larry Epston I seriously have no idea what this dialog is about. The word " Eternal " is an idea with a vague connotation of unending existence. Not a problem as concepts go, but why would anyone want to turn it into some kind of structure to allow for some kind of grasping or stabilizing, or whatever the hell the idea actually is here? My expressions are not always as simplified as they could be cause I sometimes get carried away, but I do try not to create mental complexity for no reason at all. It's interesting to me that this has been occurring here, and even more interesting that such complexity is employed in discussions about the problematic nature of thought. (Would this be mind^2, or mind in transitory interdimensional retreadification?~ Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/2/2006 5:05:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > I seriously have no idea what this dialog is about. The word " Eternal " is an > idea with a vague connotation of unending existence. Not a problem as > concepts go, but why would anyone want to turn it into some kind of structure to > allow for some kind of grasping or stabilizing, or whatever the hell the idea > actually is here? > > My expressions are not always as simplified as they could be cause I > sometimes get carried away, but I do try not to create mental complexity for no > reason at all. It's interesting to me that this has been occurring here, and even > more interesting that such complexity is employed in discussions about the > problematic nature of thought. (Would this be mind^2, or mind in transitory > interdimensional retreadification?~ > > Phil > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > .........bob > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 In a message dated 4/3/2006 6:31:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Nisargadatta writes: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:25:55 -0000 " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 Re: The Uimate Nakedness --- In Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/2/2006 5:05:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > I seriously have no idea what this dialog is about. The word " Eternal " is an > idea with a vague connotation of unending existence. Not a problem as > concepts go, but why would anyone want to turn it into some kind of structure to > allow for some kind of grasping or stabilizing, or whatever the hell the idea > actually is here? > > My expressions are not always as simplified as they could be cause I > sometimes get carried away, but I do try not to create mental complexity for no > reason at all. It's interesting to me that this has been occurring here, and even > more interesting that such complexity is employed in discussions about the > problematic nature of thought. (Would this be mind^2, or mind in transitory > interdimensional retreadification?~ > > Phil > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > .........bob AHA! Your antidisestablishmentarianism is showing, Bob. Phil(etymologically speaking) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/3/2006 6:31:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:25:55 -0000 > " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 > Re: The Uimate Nakedness > > --- In Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 4/2/2006 5:05:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I seriously have no idea what this dialog is about. The > word " Eternal " is an > > idea with a vague connotation of unending existence. Not a problem > as > > concepts go, but why would anyone want to turn it into some kind of > structure to > > allow for some kind of grasping or stabilizing, or whatever the > hell the idea > > actually is here? > > > > My expressions are not always as simplified as they could be cause > I > > sometimes get carried away, but I do try not to create mental > complexity for no > > reason at all. It's interesting to me that this has been occurring > here, and even > > more interesting that such complexity is employed in discussions > about the > > problematic nature of thought. (Would this be mind^2, or mind in > transitory > > interdimensional retreadification?~ > > > > Phil > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > .........bob > > > > AHA! Your antidisestablishmentarianism is showing, Bob. > > Phil(etymologically speaking) > > Point well made. Concise and a winner of and on the " $64,000. Question " in the fifties. Remember when that meant you were rich beyond human conceiving? Things change, that's for dang sure!.....bob > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > .........bob i love that is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to be describing itself! i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' up a breeze! Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > .........bob > > > i love that > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > be describing itself! > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > up a breeze! > > > Bill > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the parasympathetic fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the glorious glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to strike a phrase......bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > .........bob > > > > > > i love that > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > be describing itself! > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > up a breeze! > > > > > > Bill > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the parasympathetic > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the glorious > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to strike a > phrase......bob > Now is that a riot or what! You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right-brained. What do you think? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the parasympathetic > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the glorious > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to strike a > > phrase......bob > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right-brained. > What do you think? > > > Bill > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me say this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, right there is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left anything behind either to the right or the left. That which is left after this discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of centre, which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But a little nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water spout, as down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy-bitsy spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the pain will gain on him. ..........bob ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking > in > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > parasympathetic > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the glorious > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to strike > a > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right-brained. > > What do you think? > > > > > > Bill > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me say > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, right there > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left anything > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left after this > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of centre, > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at the > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But a little > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so right > when you've left youself behind. > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water spout, as > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy-bitsy > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the pain will > gain on him. > ..........bob ;-) > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. ~~~~~ love it Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking > > in > > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > > parasympathetic > > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the glorious > > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to strike > > a > > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right-brained. > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me say > > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, right there > > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left anything > > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left after this > > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of centre, > > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at the > > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But a little > > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so right > > when you've left youself behind. > > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water spout, as > > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy-bitsy > > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the pain will > > gain on him. > > ..........bob ;-) > > > > > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness > obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards that > something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. > > ~~~~~ > love it > > > Bill > Thank you Bill. Now what does ~~~~ mean or signify? I'm just getting on to these symbol things and I want to learn more more more.. .....bob (:-0)------< (;o))---)/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally > speaking > > > in > > > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the > many > > > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > > > parasympathetic > > > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the > glorious > > > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to > strike > > > a > > > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right-brained. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me say > > > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, right > there > > > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left > anything > > > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left after > this > > > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of > centre, > > > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at the > > > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But a > little > > > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so > right > > > when you've left youself behind. > > > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water spout, as > > > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy-bitsy > > > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the pain > will > > > gain on him. > > > ..........bob ;-) > > > > > > > > > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness > > obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards that > > something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. > > > > ~~~~~ > > love it > > > > > > Bill > > > Thank you Bill. Now what does ~~~~ mean or signify? I'm just > getting on to these symbol things and I want to learn more more more.. > .....bob (:-0)------< > (;o))---)/ > just intended as a separator, Bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > > > > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally > > speaking > > > > in > > > > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > > > > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the > > many > > > > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems to > > > > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really flappin' > > > > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > > > > parasympathetic > > > > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the > > glorious > > > > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to > > strike > > > > a > > > > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > > > > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right- brained. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me say > > > > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, right > > there > > > > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left > > anything > > > > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left after > > this > > > > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of > > centre, > > > > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at the > > > > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But a > > little > > > > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so > > right > > > > when you've left youself behind. > > > > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water spout, as > > > > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy- bitsy > > > > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the pain > > will > > > > gain on him. > > > > ..........bob ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness > > > obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards that > > > something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. > > > > > > ~~~~~ > > > love it > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > Thank you Bill. Now what does ~~~~ mean or signify? I'm just > > getting on to these symbol things and I want to learn more more more.. > > .....bob (:-0)------< > > (;o))---)/ > > > just intended as a separator, Bob > Oh Darn!..by the way that little deal up above is me holding a liitle puppet. If I had my sooners it would be either Elmo or Ernie..seriously! ..........bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > <Roberibus111@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " > <illusyn@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the > reciprocational > > > > > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally > > > speaking > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any > ideaficational > > > > > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding > the > > > many > > > > > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that > has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems > to > > > > > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really > flappin' > > > > > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > > > > > parasympathetic > > > > > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the > > > glorious > > > > > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to > > > strike > > > > > a > > > > > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > > > > > > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right- > brained. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me > say > > > > > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, > right > > > there > > > > > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left > > > anything > > > > > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left > after > > > this > > > > > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of > > > centre, > > > > > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at > the > > > > > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But > a > > > little > > > > > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so > > > right > > > > > when you've left youself behind. > > > > > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water > spout, as > > > > > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy- > bitsy > > > > > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the > pain > > > will > > > > > gain on him. > > > > > ..........bob ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness > > > > obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards > that > > > > something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~ > > > > love it > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > Thank you Bill. Now what does ~~~~ mean or signify? I'm just > > > getting on to these symbol things and I want to learn more more > more.. > > > .....bob (:-0)------< > > > (;o))---)/ > > > > > just intended as a separator, Bob > > > Oh Darn!..by the way that little deal up above is me holding a > liitle puppet. If I had my sooners it would be either Elmo or > Ernie..seriously! > ..........bob > is it them puppets that write these messages we read? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " > > <Roberibus111@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " > > <illusyn@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the > > reciprocational > > > > > > > > > > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally > > > > speaking > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any > > ideaficational > > > > > > > > > > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding > > the > > > > many > > > > > > > > > > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > > > > > > > > > .........bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i love that > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that the kind of thing they say that > > has " truthiness " ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > anyway, the extradimensional speaking in tongues seems > > to > > > > > > > > > be describing itself! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i mean those extradimensional tongues are really > > flappin' > > > > > > > > > up a breeze! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as long as the glossopharyngeal nerve including the > > > > > > parasympathetic > > > > > > > > fibers to the the otic ganglion are not strained in the > > > > glorious > > > > > > > > glossalalia we are doin' alright, breezin' right along to > > > > strike > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > phrase......bob > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now is that a riot or what! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You know Bob, I think you are just an itty bit right- > > brained. > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you're right Bill, and not to be left behind let me > > say > > > > > > this about that: whenever I find myself in my right mind, > > right > > > > there > > > > > > is where I find myself in my right brain, not having left > > > > anything > > > > > > behind either to the right or the left. That which is left > > after > > > > this > > > > > > discovery made by me myself beside myself , to the right of > > > > centre, > > > > > > which is to the left side of nothingness, I also see that at > > the > > > > > > right hand of the father the nothingness obtains as well.But > > a > > > > little > > > > > > nothing goes a long way towards that something that feels so > > > > right > > > > > > when you've left youself behind. > > > > > > Thoughts of an itsy-bitsy spider who goes up a water > > spout, as > > > > > > down comes the rain which washes him right out. Than itsy- > > bitsy > > > > > > spider climbs up the spout again. And if it rains again the > > pain > > > > will > > > > > > gain on him. > > > > > > ..........bob ;-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I also see that at the right hand of the father the nothingness > > > > > obtains as well. But a little nothing goes a long way towards > > that > > > > > something that feels so right when you've left youself behind. > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~ > > > > > love it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > Thank you Bill. Now what does ~~~~ mean or signify? I'm just > > > > getting on to these symbol things and I want to learn more more > > more.. > > > > .....bob (:-0)------< > > > > (;o))---)/ > > > > > > > just intended as a separator, Bob > > > > > Oh Darn!..by the way that little deal up above is me holding a > > liitle puppet. If I had my sooners it would be either Elmo or > > Ernie..seriously! > > ..........bob > > > is it them puppets that write these messages we read? > Those and a few more too. I'm still a kid at heart and Loving it! If the sounds of those little pals ever fall silent..I'm done for. ......bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 4, 2006 Report Share Posted April 4, 2006 In a message dated 4/4/2006 2:05:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time, Nisargadatta writes: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:20:47 -0000 " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 Re: The Uimate Nakedness --- In Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote: > > > In a message dated 4/3/2006 6:31:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > Nisargadatta writes: > > Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:25:55 -0000 > " Bob N. " <Roberibus111 > Re: The Uimate Nakedness > > --- In Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > In a message dated 4/2/2006 5:05:13 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I seriously have no idea what this dialog is about. The > word " Eternal " is an > > idea with a vague connotation of unending existence. Not a problem > as > > concepts go, but why would anyone want to turn it into some kind of > structure to > > allow for some kind of grasping or stabilizing, or whatever the > hell the idea > > actually is here? > > > > My expressions are not always as simplified as they could be cause > I > > sometimes get carried away, but I do try not to create mental > complexity for no > > reason at all. It's interesting to me that this has been occurring > here, and even > > more interesting that such complexity is employed in discussions > about the > > problematic nature of thought. (Would this be mind^2, or mind in > transitory > > interdimensional retreadification?~ > > > > Phil > > > > In all doubtilatiosness, considering the reciprocational > retreadification of the matter.. extradimensionally speaking in > tongues, I would agree.I don't have any ideaficational > thoughtasiousness on da types of thinks regarding the many > maeningifications hereof Phil...:-) > > .........bob > > > > AHA! Your antidisestablishmentarianism is showing, Bob. > > Phil(etymologically speaking) > > Point well made. Concise and a winner of and on the " $64,000. Question " in the fifties. Remember when that meant you were rich beyond human conceiving? Things change, that's for dang sure!.....bob > WoooHoooo!! The mortgage payment is made this month at least. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.