On K not providing easy answers, etc.

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 4/2/2006 7:02:52 PM Pacific Daylight Time,

adamson writes:

 

> The trick/challenge to be aware fully from moment to moment

> accumulating no *debris*. The non-accumulation occurs naturally as an

> automatic by-product of looking observing innocently, without adding

> " knowledge " . Full (100%) perception obviates conception.

>

>

 

L.E: Well, I can see by reading the above statement why you find an affinity

with K.

You are presenting a fantasy masked as a possibility. K would be proud of

you.

K ask lots of questions as his lecture technique bur I doubt if he could

answer his own questions, just as you are presenting a trick/challenge that you

or

most people cannot do. Sounds good in words but where's the beef? As you go

through a usual day, what percentage of the time do you exist in full

perception? Zero? Just like K. you are most likely talking about something you

cannot accomplish and present an abstraction as a reality. Really, shame on you.

And, have you ever considered the difference between knowing and knowledge?

Isn't knowledge that accumulated debris of moments of knowing? Your whole idea

of " adding knowledge " is absurd unless you are talking about memorizing

something in a book.

 

Larry Epston