Guest guest Posted April 3, 2006 Report Share Posted April 3, 2006 EXPERIMENTS INVESTIGATING THE NATURE OF ESP and the paranormal have been carried out in the West now for over 100 years. ESP abilities have been demonstrated to the satisfaction of most but we still have no inkling of how it operates. We do not know scientifically how paranormal information is received or sent, and even more puzzling is its unpredictable nature. In the laboratory no subject has been able to consistently produce ESP results. Outstanding results may be produced for a short period of time, only to have further efforts bring nothing whatsoever. A certain serendipity is involved that defies any conscious control. Richard Rose, founder of the West Virginia based TAT Foundation, has formulated a general theory of the paranormal that contains this serendipity or " Between-ness " as its central facet. Rose's concept of Between-ness is that it is a peculiar mental state that " causes things to happen. " This idea is complex, but through intuition it can be conveyed in simple terms. A radio show host once asked Rose to describe Between-ness in the simplest manner possible. He replied that it would take some time to explain it adequately, but that perhaps an example in everyone's experience would help. " If you have ever rolled dice, then you know what Between-ness is. Any man that has ever rolled dice or played cards has had it in the back of his mind that if he held his head a certain way, he'd win. " The elusive nature of ESP phenomena becomes obvious in the laboratory setting in which card guessing and other means are experimented with. One curiosity has been labeled " psi-missing. " This has repeatedly been observed and occurs when a subject being tested for ESP consistently guesses below chance. That is, if 25 % right guesses can be expected from chance, the subject may consistently get only 15 % right answers. This is as great an indication of ESP as if he were to score significantly above chance. Another peculiar unpredictability that has turned up in ESP experiments is that a subject may be " out of phase " with the series of cards he is guessing. He may only get chance expectations on the specific cards at which he is guessing, but if his guesses are later matched to the next card or two cards ahead in the series, then his guesses turn out to be highly significant. In these cases it would appear that the subject is being precognitive even though he is not trying to be precognitive. Successful ESP scoring has been found to have very little to do with amount of effort. It has been found that the best results occur when the subject is relaxed and interested in what is going on. In many studies belief in ESP has proven to have little to do with significant results. Gertrude Schmeidler, in extensive tests in the 1950's, discovered that a negative but interested attitude toward ESP favored significant scores below chance! In other words, it has been found that the best subjects are in a state between making a strenuous effort and not being interested at all, or making no effort. The " catch me not " nature of ESP has been described by parapsychologist John Palmer as best attained in a mood of " relaxed spontaneity. " Garrett has described it as a " playfulness, " a mood between being serious and not serious. It is a mood of interest, but not too much interest. Researcher Charles Honorton describes the ESP-productive mood in the following way: " The kind of mental relaxation described... seems to involve effortless intention, or what some present-day bio-feedback researchers call 'passive volition.' This is a mind-set which is characterized by 'allowing it to happen' with a minimum of ego involvement and conscious striving. " " Effortless intention " or " passive volition " are paradoxical states to our normal manner of thinking. They are mid-states or Between-ness points to our normal emotions. It has been established scientifically that there is no physical medium for ESP. Experiments have been successfully conducted in Faraday cages which eliminate all electromagnetic emanations such as radio waves and the like. This would point to a non-physically- detectable source as the carrier of ESP. Since - presumably - a nonphysical mind is the receiver and sender of ESP, it would seem dependent on the state of that mind to determine how receptive it is. This state would seem to be an alert ambiguousness or Between-ness in which mind is momentarily not chained to any obsessive or totally occupying state of functioning as it normally is in the day-to-day world. Moments of reverie, dreams, and hypnagogic or hypnopompic states fit into this category, and all have been demonstrated as conducive to ESP. Garrett, probably this century's most outstanding psychic, wrote that " ... I knew from experience that conscious effort was the one thing which would produce no results that could be described as supernormal. " Felicia Parise, the European telekinetic psychic, made a discovery similar to Garrett's. She had been trying for several weeks to move small objects with her mind and had given up in failure. She had made great efforts of concentration but it had been to no avail. One day the telephone rang and she answered it only to discover the shocking news that her grandmother had died. After hanging up, she reached for a plastic bottle and it scooted away from her across the table. The conscious ego and conscious effort seem to interfere with paranormal results. As shown in an extensive study by Louisa Rhine, the greatest frequency of valid ESP experiences is in dreams when the conscious ego is not present at all. This ego-caused inhibition apparently includes any attempt to use the powers for personal gain. Katherine Craig writes in her book The Fabric of Dreams that " ...psychically gifted persons know that when they attempt to apply their powers of clairvoyance and of penetration to themselves or for personal ends, these powers become void. " Uri Geller has tried to use his abilities at Las Vegas several times only to lose his shirt each time. If the ego is inhibitory to psychic phenomena, it explains why a subject cannot perform on demand in a laboratory. A certain egoless or relaxed state is called for between trying and not trying. In our normal ego state paranormal abilities are not considered possible or likely. In our normal paradigm we simply do not believe that we can tune in on someone's thoughts. It may be that the paradigm or belief- status creates limits on reality and what is possible. Our belief- status or paradigm may have a greater effect on our experienced reality than we suspect. I once observed my young brother repeatedly open a good quality padlock with a paper clip. He seemed to think nothing unusual about it and continued to amuse himself closing and then opening it again. I asked him how he did it and he replied that " It's easy, " and did it again for me. After I finally expressed my great amazement, it was curious that he could no longer open the padlock. My postulation is that he did not realize that people weren't supposed to be able to do such things. After I expressed my amazement I succeeded in indoctrinating him into the world-view that such things are impossible. I convinced him that it was an extraordinary thing to do and then he could no longer do it. The very laws of what is possible and impossible may be controlled by our belief systems in even more dramatic fashion than this minor example. Many machines and techniques have been discovered or designed which were thought to be physically impossible before their employment. Often the inventor does not know that what he does is supposedly impossible. It is only afterward that new " laws " are discovered to explain the inventions. I can reflect on another incident from my childhood that seems highly improbable now but didn't at the time when I was seven years old. My five year old brother had carved a wooden knife which probably weighed no more than a few ounces. We were cleaning out a corn-crib and, as anyone knows who has grown up on a farm, there were quite a few mice and rats liberated in the process. I was standing by my brother when a rat ran by about five or ten feet away. My brother had been pretending that he was an Indian and had become totally involved in the imaginary play-acting. When he saw the rat he hurled his paper- weight knife at it and - amazingly - it went through the animal and killed it! Under normal circumstances that knife would have bounced off a balloon, let alone killed an animal. I believe that, in his childish innocence, my brother caused another reality to momentarily manifest - the reality of himself as a mighty Indian hunter. In nearly every school of esoteric philosophy it is claimed that our physical world is a projection or creation of a superior and more " real " dimension. This physical world is seen as a sort of dream or re flection of essences from another plane of existence. I will not try to support this claim here, since there is ample literature on the subject, but postulate the " dream-nature " of the world as a basis in my explanation of Between-ness. In a Between-ness state one momentarily gains access to this source of creation and produces an actual alteration in manifestation on this physical level. What was originally one way is altered and becomes something different. It is as if the script is changed in a drama. One " deposits " a new idea into the creative realm and it is " born " on this plane. If being addicted and involved in our normal paradigm restricts the mind's paranormal abilities, anything that weakens that paradigm and makes it more remote may facilitate these abilities. If the normal paradigm is escaped temporarily through hypnosis, sensory isolation or meditation, a new paradigm may arise which makes more likely the occurrence of the paranormal. In fact, this is exactly what occurs. There are higher ESP results in these altered states. Charles Honorton has compiled a review of over 80 studies performed in 26 different laboratories and the over-all ESP performance in these altered states proves very significant. In these states there is no conscious attempt to produce a new paradigm, but this automatically occurs as a result of escaping or denying the exclusiveness of normal reality. Between acceptance and doubt a new paradigm is born. This new reality includes or is what we consider the paranormal. The I Ching and Tarot are uses of ritual to occupy the conscious mind with a certain controlled meaninglessness, in order for a non-ego function to manifest. Such divination does not make sense in our usual way of thinking, but at the same time we are hoping for something else and telling ourselves that normal reality may not be all there is. We are caught between normal reality on one hand and an indefinite appeal to " something else " on the other. In this Between- ness state access to paranormal information may exist. A new reality is temporarily created and this new reality does not bow to normal reasoning. The crucial state is the balanced tension between normal reality and the consideration of the " impossible " or the paranormal. There is a mass of evidence pertaining to the psychic powers of witch doctors and shamans of primitive cultures. In anthropological investigations there is much written about the shaman's understanding of the Between-ness required in producing paranormal results. Paul Adams, in his study of Huichol Indian shamans, writes: " There is a doorway within our minds that usually remains hidden and secret until the time of death. The Huichol word for it is 'nierika.' Nierika is a cosmic portway or interface between ordinary and non-ordinary realities. It is a passageway and at the same time a barrier between worlds. " While Between-ness is a mental balance and tension, shamans often incorporate physical acts of balance into their rituals to induce the proper mental state. Australian Aborigine shamans will stand balanced on one foot all day in the desert sun in the state they call " dreamtime. " Anthropologist Barbara Meyerhoff, in her article " Shamanic Equilibrium, " describes the peculiar balancing ritual of a Mexican Indian healer she met. The man had developed a considerable reputation, and as he didn't accept money for his services, he limited healing to weekends and worked for his living during the week. On Friday people would begin arriving, some from as far away as Europe. Every Friday afternoon the man would climb to the roof of his shack and remain perched on one foot on the peak for the rest of the day. Meyeroff originally thought it was his peculiar way of observing people arriving, but later realized it was a mental preparatory ritual of balance. Meyeroff witnessed a unique display of balance by a shaman during her own work with the Huichol Indians of North Central Mexico: " One afternoon, without explanation, he interrupted our sessions of taping mythology to take a party, Huichol friends and myself, to an area outside his home. It was a region of steep barrancas cut by a rapid waterfall cascading perhaps a thousand feet over jagged, slippery rocks. At the edge of the falls, Ramon removed his sandals and announced that this was a special place for shamans. He proceeded to leap across the waterfall, from rock to rock, frequently pausing, his body bent forward, his arms outspread, head thrown back, entirely birdlike, poised motionlessly on one foot. He disappeared, reemerged, leaped about, and finally achieved the other side. " He later told Meyeroff that his display was to impress upon her what extreme balance a shaman must have, and demonstrated this by marching his fingers up the strings on his violin. He also implied that it was dangerous to attempt this balance because one might " fall into the abyss. " Meyeroff further describes the elusive Between-ness state of shamanic balance: " Shamanic balance is a particular stance. It is not a balance achieved by synthesis; it is not a static condition achieved by resolving opposition. It is not a compromise. Rather it is a state of acute tension, the kind of tension which exists... when two unqualified forces encounter each other, meeting headlong, and are not reconciled but held teetering on the verge of chaos, not in reason but in experience. " Writers may sometimes place insights down in the form of fiction when they do not have enough hard evidence to place them in a scientific format. I believe Colin Wilson's The Mind Parasites is one case of this guise. In it Wilson gives the best description of Between-ness available in any popular book. Wilson's chief character finds a peculiar way of " holding his head " to do unusual things: " At this moment, a mosquito buzzed viciously past my ear with its high pitched whine; a moment later, it came past again. My mind still full of Heidegger, I glanced up at it, and wished that it would find its way to the window. As I did so, I had a distinct sense of my mind encountering the mosquito. It veered suddenly off its course and buzzed across the room to a closed window. My mind kept a firm grasp on it, and steered it across the room to the fan vent in the open window, and outside. " I was so astonished that I sat back and gaped after it. I could hardly have been more astonished if I had suddenly sprouted wings and started to fly. Had I been deceived in supposing that my mind had guided that creature? I remembered that the washroom had a plague of wasps and bees, for there was a bed of peonies underneath its window. I went along there. It was empty, and there was a wasp buzzing against the frosted glass of the window. I leaned my back against the door, and concentrated on it. Nothing happened. It was frustrating - there was a sense of doing something wrong, like trying to pull open a locked door. I cast my mind back to Heidegger, felt the lift of exaltation, of vision, and suddenly felt my mind click into gear. I was in contact with the wasp, just as certainly as if I was holding it in my hand. I willed it to move across the room. No, 'willed it' is the wrong phrase. You do not 'will' your hand to open and close; you just do it. In the same way, I drew the wasp across the washroom towards me; then, just before it reached me, made it turn and veer back to the window and out. It was so incredible that I could have burst into tears, or roared with laughter. " Wilson's character discovers a state of mind between trying and not trying, pure mental will-power he finds will not work. " You do not 'will' your hand to open and close; you just do it. " Wilson compares the unused powers of the mind to that of a huge computer at which we sit every day, only to perform simple arithmetic problems instead of using the computer's other vast powers. In the last chapter of his Mind Parasites, Wilson's keen imagination has fifty minds " en rapport " being able to alter the orbit of the moon. While this feat is proper to the realm of science fiction, such a sober mind as philosopher Franklin Merrill-Wolff believes that similar actualities are within the potential of the human mind, perhaps in some far-off age. Once again Merrill-Wolff refers to the peculiar mental balance in which the paranormal can occur: " There is a hidden, as well as an obvious, meaning behind the 'lever of Archimedes.' There is both a lever and a fulcrum, mastery of which gives power to move the world. But these forces act solely at a point of very fine balance, which is attained only with very great difficulty, and which is also not easily maintained after having been achieved. The violent wind of world-consciousness affords a most serious obstacle to the realization of such a balance, and right here lies part of the reason why humanity enjoys so restricted a portion of the benefits that might accrue to it from the great Hidden Powers of Man. " The parapsychology of the future must in part be a subjective science and investigate the subjective state that is conducive to ESP. Paranormal information has been proven to be the result of no known and measurable physical force and thus appears to be the function of a non-physical domain and a peculiar mental state. The concept of Between-ness is an effort to describe a peculiar subjective state that has been alluded to throughout paranormal literature. It is difficult to describe elusive, subjective states and an attempt to describe Between-ness is no exception. It is not a state that can be controlled, created and tested in the laboratory, but the concept of Between-ness and its ramifications can be the beginning of a whole new subjective science of the mind. by Tom Mackay posted April 3, 2006............bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.