Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Re : Leaving no residue/unconditional attention

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote:

>

>

>

> ----- Message d'origine ----

> De : billrishel <illusyn

> À : Nisargadatta

> Envoyé le : Mardi, 4 Avril 2006, 2h30mn 20s

> Objet : Re: Leaving no residue/unconditional attention

>

> Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > --- billrishel <illusyn@> a écrit :

> >

> >

> >

> > " " It occurred to me that simply

> > observing (i.e. not *doing* anything) what is

> > uncomforable is *very* important " "

> >

> > Why??

> > What happens when you don`t react?

> >

> > Patricia

> > ~~~~~~~~~~

> >

> > I don't know...

> >

> > if there is reaction, then there is just

> > observation of *that*...

> >

> > so by " simply observing " I don't mean any

> > *resisting* of doing...

> >

> >

> > I mean simply observing *whatever arises*...

> >

> > Bill

> >

> > look harder!

>

> there's not really anything I can do...

>

> not even " look harder " ...

>

> choiceless awareness is just that --

>

> no choice!

> Bill

> ..............................................................

>

>

> " there's not really anything I can do... "

>

> I love that sentence, that window is open..

> nothing one can do once surrendering to the Heart,

> this is the only true " action " we were born to take.

 

yes... beautifully said

 

> Now, what is happening that you do not do. What are the consequences.

> I pick one : the ability to truly stay put in quietude.

>

>

>

> Patricia

 

The thing about doing is that it happens.

The confusion about doing is the assumption

that " I " do it.

 

If we get angry we might think, " Ooop! There

all my 'nonduality' went out the window! "

 

But no, it is that when the behavior is

especially intense the tendancy to identify

is much greater.

 

It is not that there is a cessation in " doing " .

It is that there is a cessation in *indentification*

with doing.

 

Perhaps sitting in quietude, but eventually getting

something to eat, doing work, interactions with

others, all of it.

 

Does that seem to contradict the statement, " There

really is nothing I can do " ?

 

If so, read it this way: " There is really no doing

that I can identify with as 'me' doing it. "

 

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...