Guest guest Posted April 5, 2006 Report Share Posted April 5, 2006 A Case of Cooperation Usually it is best to approach a complex problem by way of simple detail first, then the combinations leading to the complex. The end result of that approach in the study of the brain is so bizarre with respect to the way we appear to ourselves, that it becomes confusing. If one should be unsuspecting, much is lost in the explanation of the detail. The cause of this unusual situation is the manner in which the brain developed. It was not built at one time, nor as a single object. It is not an entity that one can explain as an entity. Neural decision mechanisms in mobile complex organisms have been around more than 680 million years. The human developed from one of those early creatures. Early neural mechanisms were quite simple. Evolution, over time and with much trial and error experimentation, increased the number of neural components while constantly increasing the complexity of each. The end result, the human brain, is a cooperative of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of 'mini-brains'. The cooperative is so much in tune that it appears and functions as one. The human brain, then, is a cooperative composed of perhaps thousands of individual reactive decision mechanisms, each with its own memory, interconnection with all others, and judgement. The voting of these mechanisms is so fast and so in harmony that we perceive the entire system as being the thought of one mechanism, which, in effect, the overall system becomes. As we use our minds, it is obvious to us that we are one. There is no hint that we are actually many, in fact a great many, and that our consciousness (awareness) is the summation (vote) of these entities in the closest possible cooperation. To gain this concept of more than one contributing to our single consciousness, consider the partitioning of the brain into hemispheres. Figure 2: Dang no pix..but they aren't to interesting anyway..bn Three views of the brain are shown in figure 2. As can be seen, most of the brain is split into two hemispheres, the left and right, by a deep fissure. In general, the left half of the brain is associated with things on the right side of the body and the right half is associated with things on the left side of the body. This inversion idea also extends to sight, where the image processing area on the surface of the occipital lobes is both inverted and reversed. Between these two halves and hidden from view, there is a massive communication link, the corpus callosum, which connects the two, allowing information to pass between. Under normal conditions, anything known by one side is also known by the other, and as quickly. Our self, then, is composed of two thinking mechanisms, so totally interconnected that it appears to us to be one. Indeed, it functions as one. Certain forms of epilepsy do not respond to drug therapy and surgery becomes necessary. One of the surgical procedures consists of severing a large portion of the corpus callosum, thereby almost completely isolating one half of the brain from the other. There is an optimum ratio severed. Too much will unduly harm the function of the patient, whereas, too little will not sufficiently diminish the rate and severity of seizures. Whereas formerly each side of the brain was kept informed of the happenings to the other by way of the corpus callosum, they are now partially isolated. Bizarre effects result. Things seen only with the left eye (right hemisphere) become difficult, if not impossible, to verbalize (the left hemisphere contains the speaking vocabulary). Things seen with only the right eye are not recognized when viewed again with only the left. It is now possible for one half of the brain to have experiences and learn things that will never be known by the other. Adjustments are made quickly. The patient begins to talk a lot. It is a way of overcoming the communication difficulty introduced by the surgery. When the right eye sees anything, the left side of the brain will verbalize it (speech center is on left side of the brain). The left ear picks up the verbal symbols (phonemes), then the right side of the brain knows how to verbalize it also. A new vocal and external communication link is established between the two sides that partially offsets the internal one that has been partially disabled. The point is that these two sides of the brain are now separate entities with respect to conscious thought. They still have common control of the bodily functions and they still think they are one being, but external communication between the two is now necessary for cooperation. Before the corpus callosum was severed, the two sides of the brain functioned as an entity. Behavioral decisions were in perfect and immediate harmony, so harmonious in fact that the division between the two is intellectually and consciously invisible. Keep this in mind, as we turn toward studying the entire nervous system. The idea of separate entities cooperating so closely that they function as one is a common theme, repeated many times, throughout the brain. The evolution of the human body was incredible in its complexity. As we study the process we are continually amazed at the intricacy of its action and the beauty of its final product. As astounding as that process was and its product is, both are as nothing compared to the evolution of the human neural system and its product. The awesome complexity and exquisite beauty of the human neural system is staggering. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.