Guest guest Posted April 5, 2006 Report Share Posted April 5, 2006 Obtaining Information About the Environment Fig. 4 (%$#* & ^%$#####********!!!!)..bn As the sensors became more complex (capable) the signals they generated also became much more complex, becoming increasingly more difficult to feed into a decision matrix directly. Evolution is a reactive process, it does not plan ahead nor does it build in excess of requirements. Rather than build a huge decision mechanism in order to handle unnecessary detail and allow for future needs, it, in its trial and error method of development, was forced to adjust the amount of the detail (data compression) before entering the decision mechanism. It became necessary to preprocess this sensor data into a more compact symbolic form. Consider the human eye for example. Although it, along with its preprocessor, is an integrating device (summation, data compression), it produces similarly to a sampling device (such as a TV camera) operating at about twenty frames per second. With about 110 million sensor elements per eye and a color definition equivalent to at least 8 bits per primary color, a data flow into the decision matrix equivalent to 2,000 megabytes per second would be an overwhelming load to provide for using slow biological circuitry (would require a 200 mhz. Pentium for eye processing alone). Add millions of other inputs from taste, hearing and touch and the decision matrix would become monstrously large and also monstrously slow. Only a small percentage of that information from the eye is needed for proper decision making, and the smaller the decision matrix the faster its throughput. Data compression is a part of the data preprocessing from each of the sensor sets. The resultant compressed symbol representing current sensor status is particularly customized, through fixed processing, for the needs of the host. For example, the scene processed through a cat's eye, though the eye is similar to the human in capability and construction, would be preprocessed into an entirely different judgment symbol with different accents tailored to the needs of the cat. Of necessity, this compression (scene analysis) must also make allowances for urgency at the time, more detail being needed in times of danger, for example. Sensor preprocessing is performed in certain specified areas of the gray matter of the brain. These areas are trainable memory, genetically set aside for the specific purpose. They are genetically organized and assigned circuitry, not useful for anything else and not replaceable through retraining elsewhere if damaged. The preprocessing (data compression, symbol generation, data integration, data analysis, sensor judgment) for the human eye takes place in the occipital lobe of each hemisphere (see figure 1). The occipital lobes are well developed in all mammals. Although primary areas for various preprocessors are relatively fixed in location in the brain between individuals, there is variation both in location and size. Also, the total area used for preprocessing for certain senses are not localized. In scanning the human brain for metabolic activity while performing various functions, it appears that some preprocessing is scattered, indicating that the evolutionary development process for the function was not uniform but occurred in sporadic time episodes. The mutation which produced the improvement in a given preprocessing function did not happen at an aesthetically pleasing location, but once established was the likely loci for future beneficial mutations. The sensor and its preprocessor are integrated, providing a given function. The capability of the integrated function effects behavior. The limitations of that capability are input terms for consideration in the decision matrix. The sensors may in turn be controlled as a part of the output of the decision matrix. Turning the eyes toward a danger and concentrating mental attention there would be an example. The preliminary training for these preprocessor areas takes place during the early development of the individual. For example, the focusing and movement of the eyes along with sight correlation usually takes at least a year. The coordination of the eye with body movement takes much longer. Although this is training, it is mechanical training and has little to do with intellect. Further physical training and adjustment occurs throughout life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.