Guest guest Posted April 7, 2006 Report Share Posted April 7, 2006 Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , ADHHUB@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 4/5/2006 1:41:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > > > Nisargadatta writes: > > > > > > Wed, 05 Apr 2006 03:29:35 -0000 > > > " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> > > > Re: There Is No " Me " > > > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote: > > > > > > > > The body moves through its > > > > surroundings but without a " me " to worry about :-) > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > that fits! > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > L.E: How can you say that? The body is not just a body and > when > > > you give it some thought the word " body " is a gross > generalization. > > > The body has physical pieces, parts that together create a > > > nonphysical realm called mind, which produces ego or self. The > body > > > is atoms, molecules, cells, muscles, organs, skeleton, brain, > mind > > > and self, all working together. There is no " me " or " I " as a > > > separate distinct thing, but it exists a heat surrounds the > flame of > > > a candle, and as the flame rises out of the interaction of wax > and > > > wick, the mind rises out of the physical nature of the brain. > No > > > brain, no mind, no self. So there is no " me " then who or what > is > > > writing the words on the computer? You as no me, not me, not > I, I do > > > not exist? The body cannot move with a " me " to guide it. So > smart, > > > yet so clueless. > > > > > > > > Larry Epston > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.