Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Are Beliefs Necessary?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

In a message dated 4/14/2006 2:31:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

lissbon2002 writes:

 

>

>

> >Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

>

> >>And if you believe in the reality of something and it is a

> reality,

> >there is

> >>no longer a need for the belief. Get it?

> >>

> >>Larry Epston

>

>

>

> This is what all fundamentalistic believers think.

>

> Len

>

 

L,E: If you understood what I wrote, you would write that. But this beings

up the fundamental question, is there a state of mind, or condition of

awareness etc. that is free of beliefs? Or do you think (believe) that beliefs

conditions all perception? And to re-state my original idea, if something is

true, a

belief adds nothing to it, and is unecessary.

 

Larry Epston

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , epston wrote:

>

> In a message dated 4/14/2006 2:31:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

> lissbon2002 writes:

>

> >

> >

> > >Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

> >

> > >>And if you believe in the reality of something and it is a

> > reality,

> > >there is

> > >>no longer a need for the belief. Get it?

> > >>

> > >>Larry Epston

> >

> >

> >

> > This is what all fundamentalistic believers think.

> >

> > Len

> >

>

> L,E: If you understood what I wrote, you would write that. But

this beings

> up the fundamental question, is there a state of mind, or

condition of

> awareness etc. that is free of beliefs? Or do you think (believe)

that beliefs

> conditions all perception? And to re-state my original idea, if

something is true, a

> belief adds nothing to it, and is unecessary.

>

> Larry Epston

 

 

 

The very nature of a belief is such, that it seems very real to the

believer.

Millions of people have been killed in name of a belief, and the

killers were absolutely sure that their ideology was real.

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In Nisargadatta , epston wrote:

>

And if you believe in the reality of something and it is a there is

no longer a need for the belief. Get it?

>>>>

>>>>Larry Epston

>>

>>

>>

>>This is what all fundamentalistic believers think.

>>

>>Len

>>

>L,E: If you understood what I wrote, you would'nt write that. But

this brings up the fundamental question, is there a state of mind, or

condition of awareness etc. that is free of beliefs? Or do you think

(believe)

that beliefs conditions all perception? And to re-state my original idea, if

something is true, a>belief adds nothing to it, and is unecessary.

>

>Larry Epston

 

The very nature of a belief is such, that it seems very real to the

believer. Millions of people have been killed in name of a belief, and the

killers were absolutely sure that their ideology was real.

 

Len=

 

L.E: It hard to communicate with someone who refuses to answer my questions.

A belief stays a belief and is never real. When a person believes something

is true and acts as if they know it is true, they are making a big mistake. A

belief stays a belief. Beliefs are verbal statements or claims made by the

self or ego which acts on behalf of mind which stores the various ideas that

combine with feelings to compose beliefs. The ego, self carries out the

conclusions of mind and may make the error that their beliefs and resulting

ideology

are real, and simply acts on the beliefs that they assume are true. If they

are correct, and the belief is true they are acting from reality, if the belief

is not true, they are acting from fantasy. My guiess is that most beliefs

are not true and don't correspond to reality and that people proceed on varying

degrees of fantasy all the time. And that applies to you and Phil as well.

I try to be more tentative about things and avoid conclusions although that

may not be obvious from my writings. That's why I use " probably " and " perhaps "

a lot, and " maybe. " So I try to avoid making belief statements even though I

may be mistaken about many things. I try to see reality as it is, but I may

fail. Hard to tell isn't it?

And yes, millions of people have been killed because of beliefs that are

false, and many others have killed others because their beliefs are false. Of

course the opposite is also true. Remember, there are believers on both sides

of the gun, or the battle. Those who killed had beliefs and who were killed

had their beliefs. Believers are both the victors and the victims There are

only a few who can see the real as real, and act accordingly, of course, that's

just my opinion and may not be accurate.

 

>

> Larry Epston

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 4/14/2006 2:48:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

Fri, 14 Apr 2006 05:45:50 EDT

epston

Re: Are Beliefs Necessary?

 

In a message dated 4/14/2006 2:31:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

lissbon2002 writes:

 

>

>

> >Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote:

>

> >>And if you believe in the reality of something and it is a

> reality,

> >there is

> >>no longer a need for the belief. Get it?

> >>

> >>Larry Epston

>

>

>

> This is what all fundamentalistic believers think.

>

> Len

>

 

L,E: If you understood what I wrote, you would write that. But this beings

up the fundamental question, is there a state of mind, or condition of

awareness etc. that is free of beliefs? Or do you think (believe) that

beliefs

conditions all perception? And to re-state my original idea, if something is

true, a

belief adds nothing to it, and is unecessary.

 

Larry Epston

 

 

 

I don't 'believe' it's possible to be free of beliefs. Beliefs arise out of

experience and are not chosen, so cannot be unchosen. There is no

'unconditioning'. However, although all beliefs limit potential awareness of

Truth, they

are not the same. The concept of God as a cosmic papa is far more limiting

than the belief of Self as the singular totality of Consciousness itself, and

so there is a 'process' of spiritual evolution in which beliefs are expanded

as far as the mind will allow. This is not done to discover Truth, but to

prepare the mind to release even these expanded notions.

 

If something is believed to be true, this is just another belief. Ultimate

Truth is not a concept or belief at all.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...