Please comment on these talk segments of UG.

[Guest guest]

I haven't read much of UG and haven't

been too impressed by what I have read

of him. I have found him to use very

negative, provocative and even abusive

and insulting language.

 

Maybe, he uses it to draw attention!

 

Many people in past have used shouting,

abusing and negativity to gain attention

when they think, their ideas are not original,

fresh and innovative and may not gain

attention on its own!

 

 

Here is some of UG that I have come

across (I especially found his comments

about *God* Very *Suspicious*...

meaning, perhaps, he doesn't Know!!!):

 

 

--------------------------------

 

 

If I had ever me Einstein and if he

had enough intelligence to understand

what I am talking, I would have

finished him on one minute.

 

~UG talking to Katie and someone else.

 

http://www.well.com/user/jct/ (

UG' Official /unofficial site )

 

....

 

 

Q: But the government that is elected

represents a particular class.

 

UG: Rich people, you see -- " I want my

five acres of land to be assured. " I

have none, so it doesn't matter to me --

the land ceiling -- nothing affects me.

Even if the communists come into power,

I have nothing to lose.

 

Not that the communists can solve the

problems; nobody, no party, can solve

the problems of India; GOD ALONE, IF

THERE IS A GOD, and even that if He

can. HE IS SINGULARLY INCAPABLE OF

SOLVING (Laughs) the problems of India.

 

It is not a pessimistic evaluation of

the problems of India, but I don't see

how it is possible. I don't see any

hope for this country. I want this

country to play a very important role

in the affairs of the world. I would be

most enchanted (Laughs) if India could

play an important part. Even God cannot

do it. THE ALL- POWERFUL, ALMIGHTY GOD,

IF THERE IS ONE -- I don't know if

there is any -- if he can't do it, what

can I and you do?

 

~ UG

 

AC: [ Look at the statements. Look at

CAPITALIZED parts. What does it tell

you ? ]

.....

 

Devotional Music

-----------------------

I listen to the devotional music every

morning -- not that I'm interested in

that or anything; because I am here and

the radio is there, I tune in. Those

devotional songs -- what are they? Do

they know the meaning of those things

they are singing? It is pornography, I

am sorry to say -- really, it is

pornography. I have come to the

conclusion that the composers of all

those stotras (verses) were sex-starved

people, so they externalized it and put

it on the goddess. They do not leave

out even one part of the anatomy of the

woman in those stotras. I am not

condemning.

 

You can give mystical explanations for

all those things -- I am not interested

in the mystical explanations -- that's

only a cover-up, a hush-hush policy on

the part of those who want to put down

the questioning attitude of some of the

people, who want to know why these

things are there.

 

I was just telling the people here:

the worship of the bull there in the

temple, and the worship of Siva -- you

know that yoni and lingam business --

has come down from THE ORIGINAL MAN, TO

WHOM SEX WAS THE HIGHEST KIND OF

PLEASURE that he knew. Later on man

experienced the bliss, the beatitude,

and all that moved over; but,

originally, sex was the most important

thing. EVEN THE CROSS IS A PHALLIC

SYMBOL.

 

In the church they give wine and bread

-- what does it actually mean? You see,

they have copied it from the days of

the savages -- WHEN A HERO DIED THERE,

THEY ATE HIS FLESH AND DRANK HIS BLOOD

hoping that they would acquire the

great traits of the hero. So, that is

passed on from generation to generation.

 

.....

~ UG

 

 

Q: The Upanishadic seers, I think,

were all people who blossomed

individually.

 

U.G.: Sir, if there was anything to

the teachings of the Upanishads, there

wouldn't have been any need for Buddha

to come. Why did he? They created the

opportunity, the need for a man like

Buddha -- he came after the Upanishads.

 

You see, the Vedic stuff deteriorated,

then the Upanishadic seers arrived on

the scene; and they messed up the whole

thing, so Buddha came; and afterwards,

so many people. Buddhism deteriorated

in this country, so Sankara had to

come; and Sankara's followers did

exactly the same thing, so there arose

the need for Ramanujacharya to come --

it's the same thing, you see -- and,

after him, Madhavacharya. Where is the

room for all these teachers?

 

So, probably there is again a need for

another teacher -- GOD ALONE KNOWS. IF

HE IS THERE AROUND THE CORNER, I DON'T

KNOW. Even the avatars we have in our

midst seem unable to perform this

miracle which is necessary to save this

country and the world.