The Verbal Life

[Guest guest]

P: You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect

> the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let

> your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by

> you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you

> can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self.

>

>

> >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, Im

merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no

protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. Do

you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as

if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have

posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of

23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can

say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. Problem

for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But:

 

(a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this

diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all and

any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If

not..why not then? " .

 

(b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that smacks

of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't

like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things.

 

Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it is I

who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so

verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer

the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly

and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast

dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I

am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to

perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you?

your dear friend,

..........bob

 

P: Your eyes will wait in vain, since

Larry objects to this kind of exchange,

and I respect his wishes. But I will

crosspost your reply at Niz, and answer

you there. See you at the OK corral, Doc.

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

> P: You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect

> > the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let

> > your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by

> > you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you

> > can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self.

> >

> >

> > >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, Im

> merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no

> protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. Do

> you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as

> if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have

> posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of

> 23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can

> say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. Problem

> for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But:

>

> (a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this

> diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all and

> any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If

> not..why not then? " .

>

> (b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that

smacks

> of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't

> like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things.

>

> Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it is

I

> who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so

> verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer

> the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly

> and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast

> dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I

> am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to

> perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you?

> your dear friend,

> ..........bob

>

> P: Your eyes will wait in vain, since

> Larry objects to this kind of exchange,

> and I respect his wishes. But I will

> crosspost your reply at Niz, and answer

> you there. See you at the OK corral, Doc.

>

> No bullshit here you smartass. ;-)))))

 

.......bob

 

 

 

>