Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 In a message dated 4/17/2006 10:29:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, lissbon2002 writes: > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, > >high noon at the OK corral. Shoot > >me dead if you can. I didn't > >address that post to you, Bob, you > >took the bait, and in doing so you > >admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget > >about the flaws of the post, it was just > >a hook, and you swallowed it. > > > > Now you know, Bob, Pete isn´t here to communicate, he´s an angler > and you´re fish. World according to Pete ;-) > > L.E: Oh my! Trying for a fish, felt a jerk, and caught a jerk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 : You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect > the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let > your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by > you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you > can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self. > > > >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, Im merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. Do you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of 23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. Problem for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But: (a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all and any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If not..why not then? " . (b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that smacks of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things. Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it is I who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you? your dear friend, ..........bob P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, high noon at the OK corral. Shoot me dead if you can. I didn't address that post to you, Bob, you took the bait, and in doing so you admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget about the flaws of the post, it was just a hook, and you swallowed it. You are going in the wrong direction, Bob. The road leads to silence not to a runaway mouth. Even if you think you are on a mission to teach, you are defeating your purpose by your verbosity. You have yet to learn dosage, Bob. Doctoring, is not drowning patients in medicine. Bob, you need to heal what ails you before you can heal others. Bob, you are not the happy camper you pretend to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote: > > : You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect > > the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let > > your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by > > you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you > > can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self. > > > > > > >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, Im > merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no > protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. Do > you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as > if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have > posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of > 23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can > say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. Problem > for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But: > > (a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this > diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all and > any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If > not..why not then? " . > > (b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that smacks > of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't > like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things. > > Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it is I > who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so > verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer > the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly > and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast > dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I > am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to > perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you? > your dear friend, > ..........bob > > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, > high noon at the OK corral. Shoot > me dead if you can. I didn't > address that post to you, Bob, you > took the bait, and in doing so you > admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget > about the flaws of the post, it was just > a hook, and you swallowed it. Now you know, Bob, Pete isn´t here to communicate, he´s an angler and you´re fish. World according to Pete ;-) Len Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote: > > : You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect > > the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let > > your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by > > you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you > > can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self. > > > > > > >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, Im > merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no > protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. Do > you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as > if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have > posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of > 23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can > say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. Problem > for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But: > > (a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this > diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all and > any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If > not..why not then? " . > > (b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that smacks > of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't > like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things. > > Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it is I > who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so > verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer > the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly > and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast > dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I > am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to > perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you? > your dear friend, > ..........bob > > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, > high noon at the OK corral. Shoot > me dead if you can. I didn't > address that post to you, Bob, you > took the bait, and in doing so you > admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget > about the flaws of the post, it was just > a hook, and you swallowed it. You are going > in the wrong direction, Bob. The road leads > to silence not to a runaway mouth. Even > if you think you are on a mission to teach, > you are defeating your purpose by your > verbosity. You have yet to learn dosage, Bob. > Doctoring, is not drowning patients in medicine. > Bob, you need to heal what ails you before you > can heal others. Bob, you are not the happy > camper you pretend to be. > > > Grow up Peter...you posted on the other list that you were going to cross-post here. Unless I was a dumbass, which I am not, I can only take the issuance of that statement and the subsequent arrival of the post on this list as following a logical sequence that begs the reply. But as noted above, we know you have trouble with such disposition of thought trains and structures thereof....I followed you back and replied to the heading. Addressed here to me or not. Once again Pete you think a trap is laid and in so doing only lay bare your childish motives. Again, read the above and learn. You Pete are no Wittgenstein. I'm not always a happy camper..agreed.. if you are you must laugh youself silly..and there are places for folks in that condition. I have no mission Peter as I've said before. What is your's? Now we add another question to the list that either you cannot or will not profer answers to. C'mon Pete, I gave you more credit than I should have. Foolish me indeed. If we are at the OK Coral....and it needn't be High Noon in Tombstone friend.. (and BTW Toombstone is a really neat place..I knew you'd enjoy my aside and opinion here)..Trust me fella you are shooting wyth the Clantons. Against your idea in your salutation Peter...You aint no Doc Holiday...you're not even a Billy Clanton..the first to fall. Love my little one, ......bob > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote: > > > > : You protest too much, dear friend. I think you suspect > > > the shoe fits, but since you don't believe my words, let > > > your numbers talk, of 23 posts in this digest, 12 were by > > > you. Is that an indication of living verbally? Only you > > > can say, not to me, or anyone else, but to your self. > > > > > > > > > >You think(s) eh Wlliam.. er Pete. I'm not protesting Peter, > Im > > merely pointing out obvious deficiencies in YOUR argument.I have no > > protest, no argument. I post but, do not live in, or by my posts. > Do > > you? Seems so from your perceived need to defend your statements as > > if any words, seemingly disagreeing with those words that you have > > posted, were risking your personal survival.As to the 12 out of > > 23..Mmmm so what? I like to write, I like to post. So as only I can > > say..as you say...Yeah? Indication of living verbally?...No. > Problem > > for Pete..Yes. Why..I don't know, only he can say. But: > > > > (a) he hasn't answered the question of the post that produced this > > diatrabe..i.e.: The " mystery and profundity' is a quality of all > and > > any thing,person, place, condsideration or activity...is it not? If > > not..why not then? " . > > > > (b) Peter has a proclivity for objecting to anything said that > smacks > > of something he thinks he understands, but doesn't. Peter doesn't > > like to be overshadowed, Peter likes to whine about things. > > > > Well I've given answer to what I think about your saying that it > is I > > who love living verbally. And shame on me Pete..I've done so > > verbally. You know used words and such. Here's the deal..you answer > > the questions of the first post(verbally, I won't be ungentlemanly > > and jump up and make proclomations about your life style or cast > > dispersions about shoes fitting etc.). I'll listen. Just answer. I > > am 'all ears' sir. Even though of course I'll be using my eyes to > > perceive and read the post. But you know what I mean....dont you? > > your dear friend, > > ..........bob > > > > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, > > high noon at the OK corral. Shoot > > me dead if you can. I didn't > > address that post to you, Bob, you > > took the bait, and in doing so you > > admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget > > about the flaws of the post, it was just > > a hook, and you swallowed it. > > > > Now you know, Bob, Pete isn´t here to communicate, he´s an angler > and you´re fish. World according to Pete ;-) > > Len > you are correct Len, but I too am a fisher...a fisher of men. And I think I have a 'big one' on the line with Pete...and who knows? possibly......nah....he's a bottom feeder..I'll just have to throw him back. :-)) ......bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2006 Report Share Posted April 17, 2006 Nisargadatta , epston wrote: > > In a message dated 4/17/2006 10:29:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, > lissbon2002 writes: > > > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I, > > >high noon at the OK corral. Shoot > > >me dead if you can. I didn't > > >address that post to you, Bob, you > > >took the bait, and in doing so you > > >admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget > > >about the flaws of the post, it was just > > >a hook, and you swallowed it. > > > > > > > > Now you know, Bob, Pete isn´t here to communicate, he´s an angler > > and you´re fish. World according to Pete ;-) > > > > > L.E: Oh my! Trying for a fish, felt a jerk, and caught a jerk. Oh bullshit you dumbass. ......bob > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.