Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The Verbal Life

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

B: OK Pete.but NO ONE is putting a funnel in your mouth.If it's all

too much..and certainly it may be, in the number of posts that I put

on the board, if you will...just click past 'em.

 

P: Yes, That is what I do. I hardly read

anything you write, unless, it's about one

of my posts, but, again, it was you who

felt addressed by my post, so, I think, you

should ask yourself, why words are U?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

> B: OK Pete.but NO ONE is putting a funnel in your mouth.If it's all

> too much..and certainly it may be, in the number of posts that I put

> on the board, if you will...just click past 'em.

>

> P: Yes, That is what I do. I hardly read

> anything you write, unless, it's about one

> of my posts, but, again, it was you who

> felt addressed by my post, so, I think, you

> should ask yourself, why words are U?

>

 

B: Hey you aren't so slow Pete..you avoid the questions and take a lead

from Larry and don't read my posts. Good for you kid. Now maybe this

wasn't addressed to me.. see I can get confused too. Are you addressing

yourself as U here then? Oh forget it Pete.you don't read these things

anyway. And I love U too.

......bob

 

 

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of Bob's

posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming anyone. How

do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already know

how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself clear. Or

you, Len. You've made your point also. Besides these three

members, how do others look at Bob's posts? Personally, I can't

read all of them. I just don't have the time. Even if I did have

time to read them, I don't think I would because they really are

pretty long and some of them are a bit too cerebral for my brain but

overall, I like what I do find time to read of his posts. The

question is why? Why do I like to read Bob's posts? I think it

might have a little to do with the fact that I'm a sucker for

sensationalism(?), entertainment(?), I'm not sure what the right

word is. But I think you know what I mean. Or maybe not.

 

There are some posters I don't bother reading anymore only because I

canT handle a bunch of bla-bla-bla for nothing. Like my posts

sometimes. Lol. But I don't care if nobody reads them. Some

people do, some people don't. I think it's just a matter of

differences in taste and of how much time people have on their

hands. My time is limited to reading a few posts at a time and so

I've fallen into a pattern of going for all the ones that I think

might keep me interested. They have to grab my attention right away

or else i click on to the next one. Plus i'm a pretty slow reader.

Stuff takes a while to sink in for me because i have trouble

focusing my attention on any one thing for any length of time.

 

So, anyway, that's what I think about all Bob's posts and that's

what i do with everybody's.

 

Silver

 

 

Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I,

> > > high noon at the OK corral. Shoot

> > > me dead if you can. I didn't

> > > address that post to you, Bob, you

> > > took the bait, and in doing so you

> > > admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget

> > > about the flaws of the post, it was just

> > > a hook, and you swallowed it. You are going

> > > in the wrong direction, Bob. The road leads

> > > to silence not to a runaway mouth. Even

> > > if you think you are on a mission to teach,

> > > you are defeating your purpose by your

> > > verbosity. You have yet to learn dosage, Bob.

> > > Doctoring, is not drowning patients in medicine.

> > > Bob, you need to heal what ails you before you

> > > can heal others. Bob, you are not the happy

> > > camper you pretend to be.

> > >

> > >

> > >.B: You Pete

> > are no Wittgenstein.

> >

> > P: Agreed! Never said I was.

> >

> > B: I'm not always a happy camper..agreed.

> >

> > P: Two agreements in a row. We're getting somewhere!

> > Bob, I love you, as I love water, but suppose,

> > someone would put a funnel in my mouth and pour

> > gallon after gallon of the blessed liquid. Dosage,

> > Bob, dosage. Repeat that word as a mantras.

> >

> > OK Pete.but NO ONE is putting a funnel in your mouth.If it's all

> too much..and certainly it may be, in the number of posts that I

put

> on the board, if you will...just click past 'em. As once before I

> stated, we are not enclosed in a room physically, and thereby

> conditioned and restricted to aural communications, with the most

> talkative and loudest being the rub. In fact, if you observed me

in

> most social situations you'd be tempted to call me the wallflower.

In

> those situations, I enjoy observing rather than being a congenial

or

> boisterous participant in the cocktail talk. Once it was, at one

such

> fete, I mentioned as to how I wrote some little bit under a 'pen

> name', can you believe it, I was asked " Oh..and what is that

name " .

> And this was coming not from an intimate friend.it was from

someone I

> hardly knew at all. Why in the first place would I have used such

a

> nom de plum if not to remain unknown to the readership. That is

not

> the case here. But I will not apologize for doing what I find

> enjoyable, and as far as I can see harms no one. If offence is

taken

> at the number or content of any of the writings I post here..too

bad

> for the one so offended or overwhelmed. That is their problem not

> mine..as I said..walk on by and continue to enjoy your life. Now

> Peter we may have agreement on a couple of points as you said in

the

> post to which I herein reply; now how about answering a couple of

the

> other questions in the others clipped from this little running

> commentary. It's easy to go back and get them. If instructions are

> needed on how to do that.let me know. I can at least help, if not

> teach.

> .....bob

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

1069 wrote:

>

> Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of Bob's

> posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming anyone.

How

> do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already know

> how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself clear.

Or

> you, Len. You've made your point also.

 

 

 

Did I? What point did I make?

 

Len

 

 

 

> Besides these three

> members, how do others look at Bob's posts? Personally, I can't

> read all of them. I just don't have the time. Even if I did have

> time to read them, I don't think I would because they really are

> pretty long and some of them are a bit too cerebral for my brain

but

> overall, I like what I do find time to read of his posts. The

> question is why? Why do I like to read Bob's posts? I think it

> might have a little to do with the fact that I'm a sucker for

> sensationalism(?), entertainment(?), I'm not sure what the right

> word is. But I think you know what I mean. Or maybe not.

>

> There are some posters I don't bother reading anymore only because

I

> canT handle a bunch of bla-bla-bla for nothing. Like my posts

> sometimes. Lol. But I don't care if nobody reads them. Some

> people do, some people don't. I think it's just a matter of

> differences in taste and of how much time people have on their

> hands. My time is limited to reading a few posts at a time and so

> I've fallen into a pattern of going for all the ones that I think

> might keep me interested. They have to grab my attention right

away

> or else i click on to the next one. Plus i'm a pretty slow

reader.

> Stuff takes a while to sink in for me because i have trouble

> focusing my attention on any one thing for any length of time.

>

> So, anyway, that's what I think about all Bob's posts and that's

> what i do with everybody's.

>

> Silver

>

>

> Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > > P: So here we are, Bob. You and I,

> > > > high noon at the OK corral. Shoot

> > > > me dead if you can. I didn't

> > > > address that post to you, Bob, you

> > > > took the bait, and in doing so you

> > > > admitted you are a blabbermouth. Forget

> > > > about the flaws of the post, it was just

> > > > a hook, and you swallowed it. You are going

> > > > in the wrong direction, Bob. The road leads

> > > > to silence not to a runaway mouth. Even

> > > > if you think you are on a mission to teach,

> > > > you are defeating your purpose by your

> > > > verbosity. You have yet to learn dosage, Bob.

> > > > Doctoring, is not drowning patients in medicine.

> > > > Bob, you need to heal what ails you before you

> > > > can heal others. Bob, you are not the happy

> > > > camper you pretend to be.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >.B: You Pete

> > > are no Wittgenstein.

> > >

> > > P: Agreed! Never said I was.

> > >

> > > B: I'm not always a happy camper..agreed.

> > >

> > > P: Two agreements in a row. We're getting somewhere!

> > > Bob, I love you, as I love water, but suppose,

> > > someone would put a funnel in my mouth and pour

> > > gallon after gallon of the blessed liquid. Dosage,

> > > Bob, dosage. Repeat that word as a mantras.

> > >

> > > OK Pete.but NO ONE is putting a funnel in your mouth.If it's

all

> > too much..and certainly it may be, in the number of posts that I

> put

> > on the board, if you will...just click past 'em. As once before

I

> > stated, we are not enclosed in a room physically, and thereby

> > conditioned and restricted to aural communications, with the

most

> > talkative and loudest being the rub. In fact, if you observed me

> in

> > most social situations you'd be tempted to call me the

wallflower.

> In

> > those situations, I enjoy observing rather than being a

congenial

> or

> > boisterous participant in the cocktail talk. Once it was, at one

> such

> > fete, I mentioned as to how I wrote some little bit under a 'pen

> > name', can you believe it, I was asked " Oh..and what is that

> name " .

> > And this was coming not from an intimate friend.it was from

> someone I

> > hardly knew at all. Why in the first place would I have used

such

> a

> > nom de plum if not to remain unknown to the readership. That is

> not

> > the case here. But I will not apologize for doing what I find

> > enjoyable, and as far as I can see harms no one. If offence is

> taken

> > at the number or content of any of the writings I post here..too

> bad

> > for the one so offended or overwhelmed. That is their problem

not

> > mine..as I said..walk on by and continue to enjoy your life. Now

> > Peter we may have agreement on a couple of points as you said in

> the

> > post to which I herein reply; now how about answering a couple

of

> the

> > other questions in the others clipped from this little running

> > commentary. It's easy to go back and get them. If instructions

are

> > needed on how to do that.let me know. I can at least help, if

not

> > teach.

> > .....bob

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> 1069@> wrote:

> >

> > Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of

Bob's

> > posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming anyone.

> How

> > do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already

know

> > how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself clear.

> Or

> > you, Len. You've made your point also.

>

>

>

> Did I? What point did I make?

>

> Len

********

My apology, Len. I don't remember now. For all I know, maybe I got

you confused with someone else. It happens here occasionally.

 

Silver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 4/18/2006 6:14:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

Nisargadatta writes:

 

Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:46:24 -0000

" lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

Re: The Verbal Life

 

Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

1069 wrote:

>

> Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of Bob's

> posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming anyone.

How

> do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already know

> how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself clear.

Or

> you, Len. You've made your point also.

 

 

 

Did I? What point did I make?

 

Len

 

 

 

Maybe we could ask Larry? :)~

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

In a message dated 4/18/2006 3:14:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ADHHUB

writes:

 

> In a message dated 4/18/2006 6:14:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

> Nisargadatta writes:

>

> Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:46:24 -0000

> " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

> Re: The Verbal Life

>

> Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> 1069 wrote:

> >

> >Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of Bob's

> >posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming anyone.

> How

> >do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already know

> >how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself clear.

> Or

> >you, Len. You've made your point also.

 

YOY REALLY ARE HAREBRAINED AND DEMONIACAL AND A DUMBASS

               ........BOB

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

1069 wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> > 1069@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of

> Bob's

> > > posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming

anyone.

> > How

> > > do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already

> know

> > > how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself

clear.

> > Or

> > > you, Len. You've made your point also.

> >

> >

> >

> > Did I? What point did I make?

> >

> > Len

> ********

> My apology, Len. I don't remember now. For all I know, maybe I

got

> you confused with someone else. It happens here occasionally.

>

> Silver

 

 

 

I don´t mind anybody writing anything here, this is always the case

on forums which are hardly moderated. I actually prefer it to

moderated forums where everything which doesn´t fit into moderator´s

idea about what´s right and wrong is being censored.

If I don´t like something, it´s a good opportunity to watch my

reaction to it, which is much more interesting and valuable then

trying to get rid of what I don´t like. It is also very easy to just

skip messages I´m not interested in.

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> 1069@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> > > 1069@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of

> > Bob's

> > > > posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming

> anyone.

> > > How

> > > > do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already

> > know

> > > > how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself

> clear.

> > > Or

> > > > you, Len. You've made your point also.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Did I? What point did I make?

> > >

> > > Len

> > ********

> > My apology, Len. I don't remember now. For all I know, maybe I

> got

> > you confused with someone else. It happens here occasionally.

> >

> > Silver

>

>

>

> I don´t mind anybody writing anything here, this is always the case

> on forums which are hardly moderated. I actually prefer it to

> moderated forums where everything which doesn´t fit into

moderator´s

> idea about what´s right and wrong is being censored.

> If I don´t like something, it´s a good opportunity to watch my

> reaction to it, which is much more interesting and valuable then

> trying to get rid of what I don´t like. It is also very easy to

just

> skip messages I´m not interested in.

>

> Len

>

 

 

Ohhh boy!!! Memories,

ana running like hell...

 

ya don't wanna know Len,

 

Love,

Ana

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , ADHHUB wrote:

>

>

> In a message dated 4/18/2006 6:14:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time,

> Nisargadatta writes:

>

> Tue, 18 Apr 2006 12:46:24 -0000

> " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

> Re: The Verbal Life

>

> Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> 1069@> wrote:

> >

> > Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of

Bob's

> > posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming

anyone.

> How

> > do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already

know

> > how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself

clear.

> Or

> > you, Len. You've made your point also.

>

>

>

> Did I? What point did I make?

>

> Len

>

>

>

> Maybe we could ask Larry? :)~

 

 

 

Good idea. I´m very curious to hear him.

 

Len

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 " <lissbon2002

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> 1069@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " lissbon2002 "

<lissbon2002@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " s_i_l_v_e_r1069 " <silver-

> > > 1069@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Just for the record, I don't find the quantity or content of

> > Bob's

> > > > posts offensive at all. Nor do I believe he is harming

> anyone.

> > > How

> > > > do other members feel? I don't mean you, Larry. We already

> > know

> > > > how you feel. Lol. Or you, Pete. You've made yourself

> clear.

> > > Or

> > > > you, Len. You've made your point also.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Did I? What point did I make?

> > >

> > > Len

> > ********

> > My apology, Len. I don't remember now. For all I know, maybe I

> got

> > you confused with someone else. It happens here occasionally.

> >

> > Silver

>

>

>

> I don´t mind anybody writing anything here, this is always the

case

> on forums which are hardly moderated. I actually prefer it to

> moderated forums where everything which doesn´t fit into

moderator´s

> idea about what´s right and wrong is being censored.

> If I don´t like something, it´s a good opportunity to watch my

> reaction to it, which is much more interesting and valuable then

> trying to get rid of what I don´t like. It is also very easy to

just

> skip messages I´m not interested in.

>

> Len

*********

Yeah. That's a good way to look at things here, Len. It really

does come down to simply observing how we react or respond to

certain things we read here. It helps one to know oneself a little

better. Thanks.

 

Silver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...