Love Is Incapable of Adjustment (((Love is not a Thing of the Mind.

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " Bob N. " <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " billrishel " <illusyn@>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@>

> > wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > --- billrishel <illusyn@> a écrit :

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > >

> > > Some actually believe *their* words belong to them.

> > > Ha!

> > >

> > > Ownership.

> > >

> > > The tides of reality sweep beyond the preying thoughts

> > > of fools.

> > >

> > >

> > > Bill

> > >

> > Hello Bill.......I went through a whole diffenent kind of

discussion

> > and self-analysing process over this very issue with

our " Gaurdian in

> > Residence " , Pete. It all had to do with quoting " others' " words

and

> > how that just wasn't Kosher. Maybe it was Buddhist or Christian

or

> > Islamic but it sure wasn't Kosher in Pete's eyes. You may hear

from

> > him on how the propitiary rights of *their* words are paramount

to

> > the survival of our very way of life. Who knows. evidently some

of us

> > don't understand this.

> > ........bob (of many questions and no answers)

> >

>

> Perhaps you are being very subtle here?

>

> a) Pete indicates not " Kosher " to use the words of others ( " owned by

> others " )

> b) Bill says the notion that anyone owns their " own words " is

foolishness.

> c) Bob hints that if what Bill says is true then what Pete says

> is irrelevant, as " owned by " is a meaningless relation anyhow.

>

> I.e. If b) then not-a)

>

> Is that what you are saying?

>

> But I tend to agree with Pete (to a point) as *real* dialog

> is, in my view, a direct result of sticking one's neck out.

> And sticking one's neck out by quoting others doesn't happen.

>

> But heck, a slice of Krishnamurti or Nisargadatta now in then

> can be chock full of vitamins.

>

> Sure is hard to generalize, isn't it?

>

> Give it any thought at all and before you know it you

> have bushy tree of conditionals.

>

>

> Bill

>

Just a bad joke I guess Bill....I've quit posting long

quotes anyway. I certainly wasn't trying to set up anything between

you and Pete. But even after my ceasing to post longer quotes of

others and generally just posting my own whims,fancies, thoughts and

recollections....Pete still finds a problem with the number of said

posts. I don't like his venom so I was issuing a little subtle poison

of my own. And as Pete doesn't read any of my posts, except for those

in answer to his sooty side comments, I figured what harm with a

little laugh? His opinion is that I also am not 'a happy camper' all

the time..and I agreed with that. But I am now.. and I felt like a

chuckle. Our mutual friend doesn't seem inclined to answer straight

forward questions put to him, but to just ignore same and come back

with sophomoric comments so, what the hell is my attitude. Might as

well keep the fun rolling along.

........bob