Guest guest Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 ----- Message d'origine ---- De : billrishel <illusyn À : Nisargadatta Envoyé le : Jeudi, 27 Avril 2006, 5h48mn 44s Objet : Re: Re : Making Silent Mind Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > De : billrishel <illusyn > À : Nisargadatta > Envoyé le : Jeudi, 27 Avril 2006, 5h19mn 36s > Objet : Re: Making Silent Mind > > Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote: > > > > Doesn't have to be that at all. > > I said in one of my replies on this thread that > > making " silent mind " an objective is a serious > > danger, and is one reason I tend to avoid talking > > about it. > > > > PATRICIA > > > > L.E: You as ego cannot make mind silent. You as ego can be silent > and withdraw back into mind from where you come. Mind is always > silent and hidden Ego can become aware of how mind operates through > it as it. Or perhaps mind can become aware of how ego operates and > make changes in itself. Its all a unity. Brain, mind, ego. They all > work together, and are part of one another. It has to do with > changing focuses of energy moving in internal spaces. Ego is not > self-sustaining. It is an _expression of the mind's process. Even as > the ego perhaps thinks it is thinking, it is the hidden mind that is > thinking and the ego is just expressing the process of the mind. > > > > > " Even as the ego perhaps thinks it is thinking, it is > the hidden mind that is thinking and the > ego is just expressing the process of the mind. " > > Thazzz it! > > The ego (if that is the phantom that is see painted > in the clouds) is just a character in the fiction. > > Bill > > it never was. > > (sorry Toom. I took that for my own) > > Patricia It never was, but lives on... a vicarious existence in the dreams of those who truly *believe*. Bill Now, don`t get to Zen on us. What do you mean by <those who truly beleive?> Patricia ** If you do not wish to receive individual emails, to change your subscription, sign in with your ID and go to Edit My Groups: /mygroups?edit=1 Under the Message Delivery option, choose " No Email " for the Nisargadatta group and click on Save Changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > De : billrishel <illusyn > À : Nisargadatta > Envoyé le : Jeudi, 27 Avril 2006, 5h48mn 44s > Objet : Re: Re : Making Silent Mind > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > > De : billrishel <illusyn@> > > À : Nisargadatta > > Envoyé le : Jeudi, 27 Avril 2006, 5h19mn 36s > > Objet : Re: Making Silent Mind > > > > Nisargadatta , epston@ wrote: > > > > > > Doesn't have to be that at all. > > > I said in one of my replies on this thread that > > > making " silent mind " an objective is a serious > > > danger, and is one reason I tend to avoid talking > > > about it. > > > > > > PATRICIA > > > > > > L.E: You as ego cannot make mind silent. You as ego can be silent > > and withdraw back into mind from where you come. Mind is always > > silent and hidden Ego can become aware of how mind operates through > > it as it. Or perhaps mind can become aware of how ego operates and > > make changes in itself. Its all a unity. Brain, mind, ego. They all > > work together, and are part of one another. It has to do with > > changing focuses of energy moving in internal spaces. Ego is not > > self-sustaining. It is an _expression of the mind's process. Even as > > the ego perhaps thinks it is thinking, it is the hidden mind that is > > thinking and the ego is just expressing the process of the mind. > > > > > > > > > " Even as the ego perhaps thinks it is thinking, it is > > the hidden mind that is thinking and the > > ego is just expressing the process of the mind. " > > > > Thazzz it! > > > > The ego (if that is the phantom that is see painted > > in the clouds) is just a character in the fiction. > > > > Bill > > > > it never was. > > > > (sorry Toom. I took that for my own) > > > > Patricia > > It never was, but lives on... > a vicarious existence in the dreams > of those who truly *believe*. > > Bill > > Now, don`t get to Zen on us. > What do you mean by <those who truly beleive?> > > Patricia > while ego never was it lives on in the dreams of those who believe-in it, an empty vicarious existence, but nevertheless and the " one " who beieves in it itself, empty, vicarious imaginary wheels within imaginary wheels or ripples within ripples just don't get caught in the shining! to believe is to be deceived Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.