Guest guest Posted April 30, 2006 Report Share Posted April 30, 2006 " One's " existence is within the interaction of the " two " . Without objects....there could be no space. Without space......there could be no objects. The self identifies with the objects. The sage identifies with the space. There are infinite graduations in between. They both heve their existence in each other. They are not two. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 1, 2006 Report Share Posted May 1, 2006 In a message dated 4/30/2006 12:51:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Nisargadatta writes: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 16:49:01 -0000 " toombaru2006 " <lastrain Seamless " One's " existence is within the interaction of the " two " . Without objects....there could be no space. Without space......there could be no objects. The self identifies with the objects. The sage identifies with the space. There are infinite graduations in between. They both heve their existence in each other. They are not two. toombaru The concept of time implies the concept of dimension, meaningful only in the context of physicality. Likewise, the concepts of time and space are interdependent, joined by the notion of movement. Without the notion of movement (Change), both time and space lose all meaning. Phil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.