Constant vigilance as being necessary

[Guest guest]

To the best of my recollection, J. Krishnamurti and Douglas Harding have

both stated that " constant vigilance " is necessary and must be

maintained, not by *someone* (i.e., a separate *me* sense) but by

*understanding* or *intelligence* itself, otherwise " habitual ways of

thinking, reacting, functioning " reassert themselves thereby

perpetuating suffering and chaos in the world. In other words, perhaps

it's the " urge " (for lack of as better word) on the part of

*intelligence* itself yearning (or being *driven?* to function

" consciously/knowingly " in the world of appearances and relative

(re-laytive) relationships, thereby resulting in harmonious, orderly,

and healthy functioning. In other words, the flesh being informed,

instructed, and inspired by spirit.

 

Michael

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " Adamson " <adamson wrote:

>

>

>

> To the best of my recollection, J. Krishnamurti and Douglas Harding

have

> both stated that " constant vigilance " is necessary and must be

> maintained, not by *someone* (i.e., a separate *me* sense) but by

> *understanding* or *intelligence* itself, otherwise " habitual ways of

> thinking, reacting, functioning " reassert themselves thereby

> perpetuating suffering and chaos in the world. In other words, perhaps

> it's the " urge " (for lack of as better word) on the part of

> *intelligence* itself yearning (or being *driven?* to function

> " consciously/knowingly " in the world of appearances and relative

> (re-laytive) relationships, thereby resulting in harmonious, orderly,

> and healthy functioning. In other words, the flesh being informed,

> instructed, and inspired by spirit.

>

> Michael

>

 

 

 

River flowing.......snow falling......self searching.....

 

All quite narural.

 

 

 

 

toombaru