Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > > > <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thought is an impedance, not a means > > > > > > > > Thought doesn't interfere with anything. > > > > > > > > There is no interference - because nothing has its own > > > > separable > > > > existence as an " interferer " - unless you believe that > > > > your thinking has > > > > made it so ;-) > > > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > > > Maybe not an interference, but a phenomenon with a big > > > > appetite, sucking and transforming what could be > > > > otherwise. > > > > > > Nothing could be otherwise. > > > > > > Nor is it. > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > > > Nothing can be as it is. > > > > > > toombaru > > Here you are, typing your words. > > - D. > " Is' is a moment in time.. ........a conceptual stopping of that which flows. Everything changes moment to moment........Nothing is as it is. There are no separate things to be as they 'are'. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > > > <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > > > <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thought is an impedance, not a means > > > > > > > > Thought doesn't interfere with anything. > > > > > > > > There is no interference - because nothing has its > > > own > > > > separable > > > > existence as an " interferer " - unless you believe > > > that > > > > your thinking has > > > > made it so ;-) > > > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > > > Maybe not an interference, but a phenomenon with a > > > big > > > > appetite, sucking and transforming what could be > > > > otherwise. > > > > > > Nothing could be otherwise. > > > > > > Nor is it. > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > And you are Book Dan, > > > Another great fidele of Absolute Truth. > > > And since I`ve fallen in the gutter, > > > I am looking at some intersting alchemy: > > > A word of self-deception, > > > Self-created, > > > And yet its mud hasn`t reach our sleeves : not yours > > > at least. > > > Puritain of Absolute, > > > Your comments are of great value, > > > But your reaching too shallow. > > > > > > Patricia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Only the shallow can be reached. > > > > > > toombaru > > You are reaching. > > -- D. > Only the shallow can be reached. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 On 5/13/06, toombaru2006 <lastrain wrote: > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > > > <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > > > <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > thought is an impedance, not a means > > > > > > > > Thought doesn't interfere with anything. > > > > > > > > There is no interference - because nothing has its > > > own > > > > separable > > > > existence as an " interferer " - unless you believe > > > that > > > > your thinking has > > > > made it so ;-) > > > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > > > Maybe not an interference, but a phenomenon with a > > > big > > > > appetite, sucking and transforming what could be > > > > otherwise. > > > > > > Nothing could be otherwise. > > > > > > Nor is it. > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > And you are Book Dan, > > > Another great fidele of Absolute Truth. > > > And since I`ve fallen in the gutter, > > > I am looking at some intersting alchemy: > > > A word of self-deception, > > > Self-created, > > > And yet its mud hasn`t reach our sleeves : not yours > > > at least. > > > Puritain of Absolute, > > > Your comments are of great value, > > > But your reaching too shallow. > > > > > > Patricia > > > > For one who dies, there is no other to evaluate. > > > > -- D. > > > > Bodies are born....bodies die. > > No one was born......no one dies. > > > > toombaru In comments such as this your words come across as a " correction " of the other. As if to have the last word or something. Dan said something. But I see no sign of you hearing what he had to say... no co-participation in it. Rather it seems like little games with words you are playing here. Everything you write is not like that... don't get me wrong! What you say there does not *counter* Dan at all. What you have said is simply something different. When's the last time you have died? Was it more than a second ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 14, 2006 Report Share Posted May 14, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> > wrote: > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia > > <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033@> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > > <illusyn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > thought is an impedance, not a means > > > > > > Thought doesn't interfere with anything. > > > > > > There is no interference - because nothing has its > > own > > > separable > > > existence as an " interferer " - unless you believe > > that > > > your thinking has > > > made it so ;-) > > > > > > -- D. > > > > > > Maybe not an interference, but a phenomenon with a > > big > > > appetite, sucking and transforming what could be > > > otherwise. > > > > Nothing could be otherwise. > > > > Nor is it. > > > > -- D. > > > > And you are Book Dan, > > Another great fidele of Absolute Truth. > > And since I`ve fallen in the gutter, > > I am looking at some intersting alchemy: > > A word of self-deception, > > Self-created, > > And yet its mud hasn`t reach our sleeves : not yours > > at least. > > Puritain of Absolute, > > Your comments are of great value, > > But your reaching too shallow. > > > > Patricia > > For one who dies, there is no other to evaluate. > > -- D. > and so you brush aside a comment that bears a gift Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.