Guest guest Posted May 25, 2006 Report Share Posted May 25, 2006 Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's dangerous to live, you can actually die doing it! > > > > > > > > To live is to die ... now. > > > > > > > Nope, still here! ;-) > > > > Nope. > > > > After-images sure can be convincing, though. > > > After?.....after what?......and for whom?.....and images?...what are > the REAL things that these 'images' depict? > Confused in Seattle..no wait a minute..this is Ontario! > > ;-)) > > .....bob Only the one who perceives the image can answer these questions. Such questions must be answered directly, not mediated by words. Mediators involve time, involve duration. And if you know directly, you understand " image creation " and " image destruction. " You know that creation and destruction are not-two. There is no time in between in which a separable being lives. And you know what cannot be contained by any image, as well, and know it is inseparable from who one is -- yet never a self, nor an other. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.