Guest guest Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033 wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's dangerous to live, you can actually die doing it! > > > > > > > > > > To live is to die ... now. > > > > > > > > > Nope, still here! ;-) > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > After-images sure can be convincing, though. > > > > > > After?.....after what?......and for whom?.....and images?...what are > > the REAL things that these 'images' depict? > > Confused in Seattle..no wait a minute..this is Ontario! > > > > ;-)) > > > > .....bob > > Only the one who perceives the image can answer these questions. > > Such questions must be answered directly, not mediated by words. > Mediators involve time, involve duration. > > And if you know directly, you understand " image creation " and > " image destruction. " > > You know that creation and destruction are not-two. > > There is no time in between in which a separable being lives. > > And you know what cannot be contained by any image, as well, and know > it is inseparable from who one is -- yet never a self, nor an other. > > -- Dan I know. ....bob Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.