Guest guest Posted May 26, 2006 Report Share Posted May 26, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > --- dan330033 <dan330033 a écrit : > > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 " > <Roberibus111@> > wrote: > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " > <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " > <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " dan330033 " > <dan330033@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta , " Mats " > <hyl894t@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it's dangerous to live, you can > actually die doing it! > > > > > > > > > > To live is to die ... now. > > > > > > > > > Nope, still here! ;-) > > > > > > Nope. > > > > > > After-images sure can be convincing, though. > > > > > > After?.....after what?......and for whom?.....and > images?...what are > > the REAL things that these 'images' depict? > > Confused in Seattle..no wait a minute..this > is Ontario! > > > > ;-)) > > > > .....bob > > Only the one who perceives the image can answer these > questions. > > Such questions must be answered directly, not mediated > by words. > Mediators involve time, involve duration. > > And if you know directly, you understand " image > creation " and > " image destruction. " > > You know that creation and destruction are not-two. > > There is no time in between in which a separable being > lives. > > And you know what cannot be contained by any image, as > well, and know > it is inseparable from who one is -- yet never a self, > nor an other. > > -- Dan > > Find the question that doesn`t have its answer, > Then hold its rapture.... > > And then? > > Patricia > there is no " then " there is no " after " just this rapture but the " holding " ... that does fall away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.