Guest guest Posted June 9, 2006 Report Share Posted June 9, 2006 What do you mean by self-analysis? You cannot analyze yourself. Only Satguru can analyze and show your internal self. You cannot see the condition of your internal organs. Only a doctor can take the x-ray photo and will show to you. Then only you can understand your own internal system. Therefore self-analysis does not mean the analysis of yourself by yourself. It means the analysis of yourself with the help of the Satguru. Adi Sankara’s Advaita Philosophy Advaita of Adi Sankara says that every human being is Brahman (the Lord). There is a figure of speech called " Roopaka” in which the object compared is identified with the original object. Ex: This man is tiger. This means that the man and the tiger are very much similar in qualities. So instead of telling the Lord is like human being it is said as the Lord is the human being (Jeeva is Brahman). In the third stage of the university level the human incarnation of the Lord is recognized and is differentiated from the other human beings by His internal form, which is His Special knowledge (Prajnanam Brahma). In this stage all the egoism and jealousy to the human form must have been removed. At this university level Sankara proved that He alone is Eswara. The water in a drop and the water in the ocean is one and the same. The water is Brahman. The definition of Brahman is confined to simple awareness. In such case every living being (Jeeva) is Brahman since every living being is having awareness. This is the qualitative similarity between water drop and the ocean. But if you see the quantitative aspect, the water drop is the living being and the ocean is Eswara. Sankara told not only that He is Brahman but He is also Siva who is Eswara (Sivoham). Therefore He swallowed the molten lead where as the disciples could not swallow it. Thus Sankara proved that any living being is Brahman but not Eswara. One should not misunderstand that Brahman (qualitative) and Eswara (Quantitative) are one and the same. In Advaita philosophy you are reaching the self which is only the intermediate station. Ofcourse you must attain the peace which gives you lot of strength so that you will withstand the suffering by sacrifice in the next half of the journey. Sankara stopped by preaching this intermediate station to all the people. When a few people reached this station, then He opened the further path to them only. He swallowed the molten lead and preached to the disciples that He alone is the Lord. They realized the self and reached the intermediate station called Brahman by the path of ‘Aham Brahmasmi’ (I am Brahman). Brahman means simple awareness. The next half path is to reach Lord who is Eeswara. Peace is not the final fruit. Peace is only the intermediate fruit, which gives you the strength in the journey. The fruit given by the Lord is the final fruit, which are peace, bliss and all the eight super powers. If one takes a sleeping tablet, he can get peace during the sleep as well as after awakening. Detachment from the world gives you the peace (Brahman) but the fruit given by the Lord is to remain peaceful, blissful while living in this world and helping the real devotees with the help of the eight super powers (Asta Siddhis). The fruit given by the Lord will give you the real bliss i.e., the entertainment in the life game played by you in this world itself which is certainly far higher than the peace. Sivoham (I am Eeswara) as told by Sankara is the final goal and not 'Aham Brahmasmi'. Sankara lived in the world and did lot of work. He never sat idle thinking Aham Brahmasmi like the present Advaita Philosophers. Patanjali wrote Yoga Sutras and fixed Eeswara as the final goal. We remember Sankara today as the divine hero but not the other Advaita philosophers. Sankara sacrificed His mother and earning of money for the sake of the mission of the Lord. But the Advaita Philosophers sit in their houses and roll with their family bonds and simply say Aham Brahmasmi. One should become a divine hero like Sankara, Ramanuja, Madhva, Swami Vivekananda etc.; they were dynamic doing the Karma Yoga, which was without any selfishness. Their Karma Yoga was the propagation of the divine knowledge, which is Jnana Yoga but today the Advaita Philosopher is doing Karma Yoga with selfishness for his family bonds only. What is the use of their Jnana Yoga? at the lotus feet of shri datta swami surya www.universal-spirituality.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.