Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

the simplest explanation for illusion....and it's not Niz's.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I recently read a book called,

 

" Infinite Love is the only Truth, everything else is Illusion, " by

David Icke. There are a few things I'm not in agreement with

regarding his writings, but I absolutely give a big thumbs up to

his explanation on this matrix of illusion based on programming.

His is the best explanation I've read so far. David Icke is

British and has touring dates in the western U.S. in July. I'd like

to meet him just because that guys got kahunees the size of

basketballs. He doesn't care what anyone thinks of him and he

speaks in a no-frills fashion and I admire that in a person. When

I was a little child there were two things I knew and I didn't know

how I knew it, one was that this creative system is complete

illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

beings not from this earth system. I knew that within this illusion

of virtual reality there were various dimensions that humans have no

concept of and that I was going to assist in dismantling the

illusion. David happens to teach this in seminars whereas I do

remote viewing with a group regarding the many details involved in

it and he believes that consciousness can help change it all whereas

I'm not here to improve or change the illusion, but to dismantle

it. Other than those minor differences I offer his book as a primer

for those who have tunnel visions.

 

p.s.

it should be noted that David's definition of Love isn't an

emotional and airy fairy kind of love so don't even bother with the

plethora of love debates and treatises. In the sense that he uses

the word love it is defined as a pure state and the term *love*

really doesn't do it justice when defined by humanistic

definitions. I'm not into the airy fairy emotional love

definitions personally but acknowledge David's definition of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " sam_t_7 " <sam_t_7 wrote:

>

> I recently read a book called,

>

> " Infinite Love is the only Truth, everything else is Illusion, " by

> David Icke. There are a few things I'm not in agreement with

> regarding his writings, but I absolutely give a big thumbs up to

> his explanation on this matrix of illusion based on programming.

> His is the best explanation I've read so far. David Icke is

> British and has touring dates in the western U.S. in July. I'd like

> to meet him just because that guys got kahunees the size of

> basketballs. He doesn't care what anyone thinks of him and he

> speaks in a no-frills fashion and I admire that in a person. When

> I was a little child there were two things I knew and I didn't know

> how I knew it, one was that this creative system is complete

> illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

> beings not from this earth system. I knew that within this illusion

> of virtual reality there were various dimensions that humans have no

> concept of and that I was going to assist in dismantling the

> illusion. David happens to teach this in seminars whereas I do

> remote viewing with a group regarding the many details involved in

> it and he believes that consciousness can help change it all whereas

> I'm not here to improve or change the illusion, but to dismantle

> it. Other than those minor differences I offer his book as a primer

> for those who have tunnel visions.

>

> p.s.

> it should be noted that David's definition of Love isn't an

> emotional and airy fairy kind of love so don't even bother with the

> plethora of love debates and treatises. In the sense that he uses

> the word love it is defined as a pure state and the term *love*

> really doesn't do it justice when defined by humanistic

> definitions. I'm not into the airy fairy emotional love

> definitions personally but acknowledge David's definition of it.

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You say that

 

" this creative system is complete

illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

beings not from this earth system. "

 

Could elaborate on this and how it relates to " nonduality " ?

 

Thank you

 

~*~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " sam_t_7 " <sam_t_7 wrote:

>

> I recently read a book called,

>

> " Infinite Love is the only Truth, everything else is Illusion, " by

> David Icke. There are a few things I'm not in agreement with

> regarding his writings, but I absolutely give a big thumbs up to

> his explanation on this matrix of illusion based on programming.

> His is the best explanation I've read so far. David Icke is

> British and has touring dates in the western U.S. in July. I'd like

> to meet him just because that guys got kahunees the size of

> basketballs. He doesn't care what anyone thinks of him and he

> speaks in a no-frills fashion and I admire that in a person. When

> I was a little child there were two things I knew and I didn't know

> how I knew it, one was that this creative system is complete

> illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

> beings not from this earth system. I knew that within this illusion

> of virtual reality there were various dimensions that humans have no

> concept of and that I was going to assist in dismantling the

> illusion. David happens to teach this in seminars whereas I do

> remote viewing with a group regarding the many details involved in

> it and he believes that consciousness can help change it all whereas

> I'm not here to improve or change the illusion, but to dismantle

> it. Other than those minor differences I offer his book as a primer

> for those who have tunnel visions.

>

> p.s.

> it should be noted that David's definition of Love isn't an

> emotional and airy fairy kind of love so don't even bother with the

> plethora of love debates and treatises. In the sense that he uses

> the word love it is defined as a pure state and the term *love*

> really doesn't do it justice when defined by humanistic

> definitions. I'm not into the airy fairy emotional love

> definitions personally but acknowledge David's definition of it.

>

 

** Gee, isn't 'remote viewing' rather the problem, lol?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " sam_t_7 " <sam_t_7@> wrote:

> >

> > I recently read a book called,

> >

> > " Infinite Love is the only Truth, everything else is Illusion, " by

> > David Icke. There are a few things I'm not in agreement with

> > regarding his writings, but I absolutely give a big thumbs up to

> > his explanation on this matrix of illusion based on programming.

> > His is the best explanation I've read so far. David Icke is

> > British and has touring dates in the western U.S. in July. I'd like

> > to meet him just because that guys got kahunees the size of

> > basketballs. He doesn't care what anyone thinks of him and he

> > speaks in a no-frills fashion and I admire that in a person. When

> > I was a little child there were two things I knew and I didn't know

> > how I knew it, one was that this creative system is complete

> > illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

> > beings not from this earth system. I knew that within this illusion

> > of virtual reality there were various dimensions that humans have no

> > concept of and that I was going to assist in dismantling the

> > illusion. David happens to teach this in seminars whereas I do

> > remote viewing with a group regarding the many details involved in

> > it and he believes that consciousness can help change it all whereas

> > I'm not here to improve or change the illusion, but to dismantle

> > it. Other than those minor differences I offer his book as a primer

> > for those who have tunnel visions.

> >

> > p.s.

> > it should be noted that David's definition of Love isn't an

> > emotional and airy fairy kind of love so don't even bother with the

> > plethora of love debates and treatises. In the sense that he uses

> > the word love it is defined as a pure state and the term *love*

> > really doesn't do it justice when defined by humanistic

> > definitions. I'm not into the airy fairy emotional love

> > definitions personally but acknowledge David's definition of it.

> >

>

>

>

You say that

>

> " this creative system is complete

> illusion and that it's operated not by human earth beings but by

> beings not from this earth system. "

>

> Could elaborate on this and how it relates to " nonduality " ?

>

> Thank you

>

> ~*~

>

** Yah, sure. The devil made me do it! (updated for

post-xians)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...