Guest guest Posted June 16, 2006 Report Share Posted June 16, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > > > > > > does your world have " human beings " in it? > > > > > > my world doesn't. > > > > > > in fact, there's no world. > > > > > > just this moment splashing all over > > > and dissolving again... > > > > > > and again... > > > who is this " my " by the way ? > ...iietsa > just an " expedient term " please do not read an implied consceptual infrastructure on the part of the author simply because " he " uses the term " I " for example. and as said, there's no " world " , so any " myness " to it goes with that. but what I wrote there was not put the best, really. What I was trying to get at was that a statement such as: " why do human beings make use of the mind all the time ? " gets in its own way by postulating the existence of " human beings " as an important way of seeing the world. I don't see the world in those terms. And isn't it arbitrary to do so? Stated differently, why does it matter what " human beings " think? is there anything that really *matters*? this moment is now dissolving into the close of this post... timelessness covers over itself and Whooosh! how new! everything sparkling, pristine... Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.