Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

RE : all knowledge is ignorance/toombaru

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > --- toombaru2006 <lastrain@> a écrit :

> >

> > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart "

> > > <pliantheart@>

> > > wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " pliantheart " <pliantheart@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " toombaru2006 " <lastrain@>

> > > wrote:

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " pliantheart " <pliantheart@>

> > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " toombaru2006 "

> > >

> > > <lastrain@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " anabebe57 " <kailashana@>

> > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " pliantheart "

> > > > > <pliantheart@>

> > > > > > > > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Nisargadatta ,

> > > " iietsa " <iietsa@>

> > > > wrote:

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > some may say, that some knowledge

> > > is better than other

> > > > > > > > > > knowledge....

> > > > > > > > > > > > but that is just

> > > knowledge.......ignorance

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > ...iietsa

> > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > of one has acquired a habit of

> > > continually returning

> > > > > > > > > > > to the now, to the present moment,

> > > is that habit

> > > > > > > > > > > knowledge?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > and if so is it ignorance?

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > Bill

> > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > In order to return to the now.....one

> > > would have to

> > > somehow have

> > > > > > > > > gotten outside of the now....and then by

> > > definition would be

> > > > > forever

> > > > > > > > > lost in some strange place.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > toombaru

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > I'm sort of with you on that...

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > any not-in-the-now-ness would have to be

> > > virtual,

> > > > > > > > not real, as now is always necessarily the

> > > case.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > hence any " return to the now " would have

> > > to be

> > > > > > > > virtual as well.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > which is a kind of strangeness.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > but then the " forever lost " part of your

> > > argument

> > > > > > > > does not apply.

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > do we agree that sometimes it happens that

> > > a case

> > > > > > > > of not-in-the-now can undergoe some sort

> > > of (virtual)

> > > > > > > > " transformation " such that no longer

> > > not-in-the-now?

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Bill

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > Bill

> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > No.........we do not agree.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > 'Now' is a concept involving another concept

> > > 'time'.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > Time would have to be able to be divided

> > > into tiny segments in

> > > order

> > > > > > > for there to be a definite now.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > When the secondary conceptual overlay is

> > > seen for what it

> > > is..(by no

> > > > > > > one)......It falls apart......and in its

> > > place......the most

> > > > pristine

> > > > > > > naturalness shines through.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > OK... so what does that have to do with " now " ?

> > > > > > Nothing?

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And " now " is a concept etc. etc.

> > > > > > but " the most pristine naturalness " is not, I

> > > suppose.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > And speaking of CONCEPTS, your " secondary

> > > conceptual overlay "

> > > > > > really takes the cake!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Talk about indulging in thought systems!

> > > > > > You are in NO PLACE to talk!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bill

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Then don't listen to me.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > toombaru

> > > > >

> > > >

> > > > it has never been about " listening to you " ....

> > > >

> > > > You go around this list calling everyone on

> > > > what you claim to be nonsense in their posts.

> > > > I'm calling you on what I regard as nonsense

> > > > in what you post.

> > > >

> > > > You refer to " now " is a concept as if that

> > > > dismisses it. So I ask you, how is " the most

> > > > pristine naturalness " any different?

> > > >

> > > > Similarly with your " secondary conceptual

> > > overlay " .

> > > >

> > > > Do you see what I mean about how you seem to

> > > > apply a double standard? Please explain to me how

> > > > you are not applying a double standard.

> > > >

> > > > Bill

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Of course I am applying a double standard.

> > >

> > > That is what language does.

> > >

> > >

> > > toombaru

> > >

> > Sometimes intuition, reading between the lines,

> > starting to understand someone, their way of

> > expressing, their struggle, their sincerity, their

> > intent, all that helps to a better understanding and

> > communication.

> > I understand better what Bill means by Now, it took me

> > some searching within, I also know his intents because

> > I`ve lend an ear, because there is an interest in the

> > human being.

> > Interaction is delightfull in all its imperfection.

> > I find it intersting to understand all of us on this

> > list. What would be the point otherwise?

> > If freedoom means no interest, no lending, no giving

> > space,...well, I`ll stay away from that.

> >

> > Patricia

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

>

> People cannot understand themselves.....yet hope to understand others.

>

> toombaru

>

To understand is to find oneself at ease with. Those ill at ease with

themselves are ill at ease with others.

 

lv

~*~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...