Guest guest Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 > you alone are constant...you are not " breaking up " > shift attention from what is moving...changing... > to your own real self...to what has never moved...changed... it is not that attention can shift *to* the " real self " , it is that attention ceases to ceaselessly move from this to that, that attention ceases to *move*, that attention is not *on* any particular. Perhaps that is what you actually mean? Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > > you alone are constant...you are not " breaking up " > > shift attention from what is moving...changing... > > to your own real self...to what has never moved...changed... > > it is not that attention can shift *to* the " real self " , > it is that attention ceases to ceaselessly move from > this to that, that attention ceases to *move*, that attention > is not *on* any particular. Perhaps that is what you actually mean? > > > Bill > You see what I mean by " literalist " ? If anybody ever offers you the same literality, you end up bailing out: it's too tiresome. Love Ya! ~*~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart wrote: > > > you alone are constant...you are not " breaking up " > > shift attention from what is moving...changing... > > to your own real self...to what has never moved...changed... > > it is not that attention can shift *to* the " real self " , > it is that attention ceases to ceaselessly move from > this to that, that attention ceases to *move*, that attention > is not *on* any particular. Perhaps that is what you actually mean? > > > Bill > attention is actively resting in itself....iietsa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2006 Report Share Posted June 26, 2006 Nisargadatta , " iietsa " <iietsa wrote: > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@> > wrote: > > > > > you alone are constant...you are not " breaking up " > > > shift attention from what is moving...changing... > > > to your own real self...to what has never moved...changed... > > > > it is not that attention can shift *to* the " real self " , > > it is that attention ceases to ceaselessly move from > > this to that, that attention ceases to *move*, that attention > > is not *on* any particular. Perhaps that is what you actually mean? > > > > > > Bill > > > attention is actively resting in itself....iietsa yes... and a great way to say it... actively resting Bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.