Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Come On Hur......what's the deal?/Bob/Bill

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart

wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Nisargadatta , " Hur " <hurg@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Nisargadatta , " roberibus111 "

> > > > <Roberibus111@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart "

> > <pliantheart@>

> > > > > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > There's 44 messages from skywhilds on 6-28 Hur.

> > > > > > So he is WAY over.

> > > > > > You said max 15.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Bill

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > I'm nowhere near that number.....but I don't mind.......I

> > guessd

> > > > I'm

> > > > > not a good counter, nor so anal-retentive to notice either.

> Oh

> > My

> > > > > Goodness!

> > > > >

> > > > > ......bob

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > One does not have to be anal-retentive to notice excessive

> > posting

> > > > and we're not talking about you bob.

> > > >

> > >

> > > Actually it is very easy to see how many times someone

> > > posts in a day with 's dandy new " Advanced Search "

> > > option. Just go to Advanced Search and put the name of

> > > an individual in the Author field and hit Search.

> > > Then just page back until you get to 24 hours ago.

> > > Sky had 44 messages just with the date of 6-28. Going

> > > back a full 24 hours would have been more.

> > >

> > > Bill

> >

> >

> > well I didn't think it was a 'hard' thing to do.......just

> > silly.....but I guess it's a " Dandy " thing to do as well...and I

> > think it takes someone with an axe to grind as well, to go

checking

> > on just exactly how many posts someone else has made in a

> day.....but

> > that is ever so'special'.

> >

> > ...............bob

> >

>

> Perhaps it is you that has an axe to grind Bob.

>

> The last time I did a count like that I came up

> with a higher number and Hur subsequently put

> someone on moderation. Do you recall? Do you

> have some left over feelings about that?

>

> In both cases Hur was musing aloud about it seeming

> that such-and-such a person was posting over-abundantly.

> The two times I have done a count was in response to

> a question by Hur.

>

> I do like to see this list moderated so as not to

> be flooded with messages by a single person.

> So if Hur starts getting suspicious then I am

> more than happy to come up with numbers for him.

> For me it is not personal.

>

> Bill

 

 

 

there is no question about it Bill.......Ido have an axe to

grind.....and thanks to that dandy advanced search option of

groups let me show you something......between April 28 and April 29

of this year, when your nom de plume was 'illusyn'......you posted 59

postings in a single 24 hour period.....if you care to hear it......I

can provide MORE abusive excessive posting days of your's........or

you can just use that dandy search option again yourself.......and

have a GOOD look into the mirror......or is this excessive posting

thing something that's OK for you.....or is that before some

arbitrary date of restriction on numbers of posts, so that you can

weasel out of the fact that you are as guilty and as phoney about it

as anyone else.........and as for derogatory remarks about

people....let's go back and review ALL you cheap shots.....how 'bout

it?......I'll do the research AND posting of the results if that

would please you.

 

 

..........bob

 

 

ps........does it please you to 'get' people moderated?... and don't

give youself so much credit........Pete and Pat had as much to do

with the crying that brought me to moderated status as anything you

did, in fact MUCH MORE..........and anyway it is Hur that makes that

choice and that is his right.........I don't do anything more or less

than you and Pete and Pat......I just don't try to cover cheapshots,

and derisions of character, and put downs, with sweet language. I

doubt this will make the list and that's too bad because it is only

the TRUTH......and sometimes some people are hated for saying THAT,

and sometimes they are shut up....and in hopes that perhaps this may

be allowed on board I'm not going to call anyone any names, even if

fitting...and I'm not using any foul language........so let's just

see.

 

..........bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...