Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

More beliefs . . .

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Other beliefs that I questioned:

 

- I should be happy.

- I should be free.

- I should be content.

- I should be loving.

- I should be joyous.

 

 

- I shouldn't be stressed.

- I shouldn't be angry.

- I shouldn't be afraid.

- I shouldn't suffer.

 

 

- I can die.

- I can not die.

 

 

- I am the human body which is experienced.

- I am not the human body which is experienced.

 

 

- I know myself.

- I don't know myself.

 

- I should be correct.

- I should be right.

 

and,

 

 

- I should know.

 

 

 

 

Interestingly, I noticed that there is stress in the thoughts involving - I

should but I feel no stress in - " I want " when I really want something. I find

" I want " part of the homogeneous reality. I find " I should " a position of

opposition [to the reality].

 

 

Further, I find no stress in thoughts like " I want X " . But, I find stress in

thoughts like " I can not get X " . When I fully experience " I want " , I feel true;

I feel in power.

 

I find " I want X " natural and true to arise on its own. But, I find " I can not

get X " an artificial thought projection that arises due to assuming ownership of

the though " I want " [which arose pretty much by itself] and, then by assuming

" ownership " of everything that might need to happen for the want to materialize.

 

I found that resting in " I want " is staying in my business. I found that the

experience of " I can not get " is due to stepping in somebody else's business;

the business of that which materializes all things in the universe.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Adithya K <adithya_comming wrote:

>

> Other beliefs that I questioned:

>

> - I should be happy.

> - I should be free.

> - I should be content.

> - I should be loving.

> - I should be joyous.

>

>

> - I shouldn't be stressed.

> - I shouldn't be angry.

> - I shouldn't be afraid.

> - I shouldn't suffer.

>

>

> - I can die.

> - I can not die.

>

>

> - I am the human body which is experienced.

> - I am not the human body which is experienced.

>

>

> - I know myself.

> - I don't know myself.

>

> - I should be correct.

> - I should be right.

>

> and,

>

>

> - I should know.

>

>

>

>

> Interestingly, I noticed that there is stress in the thoughts

involving - I should but I feel no stress in - " I want " when I really

want something. I find " I want " part of the homogeneous reality. I

find " I should " a position of opposition [to the reality].

>

>

> Further, I find no stress in thoughts like " I want X " . But, I find

stress in thoughts like " I can not get X " . When I fully experience " I

want " , I feel true; I feel in power.

>

> I find " I want X " natural and true to arise on its own. But, I

find " I can not get X " an artificial thought projection that arises

due to assuming ownership of the though " I want " [which arose pretty

much by itself] and, then by assuming " ownership " of everything that

might need to happen for the want to materialize.

>

> I found that resting in " I want " is staying in my business. I

found that the experience of " I can not get " is due to stepping in

somebody else's business; the business of that which materializes all

things in the universe.

>

>

>

 

I loved your entire list, but then I got the last paragraph...

Why must there be an explanation... a pat answer? Do you desire

'reasons why " more than you desire things? What do we have when we

have order in place of confusion?

My only point I am going for is that answering the questions I asked

may tell you something useful.

 

Stu

 

 

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

" Interestingly, I noticed that there is stress in the thoughts

involving - I should but I feel no stress in - " I want " when I really

want something. "

 

That sounds right. The psychological definition of stress goes

soemthing like: that which is the result of not being prevented from

doing what we want to do. Should,being conditional means " want but

can't/don't "

 

I think it's the right thing to do to reduce stress as much as

possible in life, although it seems like we need a little stress to

function in the rat race. Just like we need some ego. Many of do jobs

that kind of engross us in the material world. Better to be a kitchen

worker or cleaner. Or a floor polisher at an airport is a really good

one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

> Interestingly, I noticed that there is stress in the thoughts

involving - I should but I feel no stress in - " I want " when I really

want something. I find " I want " part of the homogeneous reality. I

find " I should " a position of opposition [to the reality].

>>>>

good observations...

 

Statements of the form " I want X " are not stressful

because they simply state a fact, assuming for a

particular X it is true.

You can test this by making a statement of the form

" I want X " where the statement is *not* true.

For example, say, " I want to drink a glass of puke. "

You might find actually saying such a statement, especially

outloud, to be actually stressful, because something in

you will be, at the same time, saying, " No! " So then

there is conflict.

 

But there can be also cases of " I want X " that are true

but can bring on stress. For example, if one has vowed

to quit smoking, the statement, " I want a cigarette "

could potentially be stressful, depending on the individual,

because even a true observation can bring up conflict.

 

But for the most part it seems that statements of the form

" I want X " that are true statements will not be stressful.

 

A statement of the form " I should do X " will most likely

entail conflict. One does not say, " I should do X " where

there is no issue around doing it in the first place.

For example, if one routinely brushes one's teeth in the

morning the statement, " I should brush my teeth this morning, "

will be unlikely to come up because we don't say " should "

regarding things where there is no issue around doing them.

It is not the word " should " itself, necessarily, but that

we typically use that word when there are opposing forces

within us around doing a thing.

 

Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...