Guest guest Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 Nisargadatta , " dannyc_1eyeluv " <dannyc_1eyeluv wrote: > > Per my reading Dan did not repeat what you said. > > > > when you say: > > " these 'true' concepts of yours are just as illusory as the so > > called 'false' ones " > > you seem to be saying that any expression of concepts is > > illusory. Is that what you are saying? > > > > Dan said (referring to your statement above): > > " it's meaningless to say that concepts are true or false " > > > > How can you say he is saying the same thing as you > > when he is clearly disagreeing with what you said? > > > > Bill > > > ^^^^i dunno. i musta misread what he said coz what you said he said > about what i said doesn't sound like what he said i said at all. LOL > dc^^^^ Is the " he " that said that then the same as the " he " that is saying this now? Or is each now-moment sufficient unto itself? And the " he " of this now-moment, simply the conceptual " thinker " arising with this thought of this now, and referring to nothing outside? And not a succession of moments taking time, but simply the mutual co-arising of now-moments as now - always as now? And if so, then how can we be having an exchange, as if separately existing " he's " were conversing across different " nows " each being experienced by a separable being? Because it's all simply a " mutual co-arisingness " -- there isn't really any existing thing or being or self -- nor is there any way to say that something is missing, that a self is not. So, this " he " that is finishing this statment by typing the last letter, isn't the same as the " he " that started the sentence -- let alone commenting successfuly as a continuing " he " about " you " as a continuing " you " and what you are supposedly doing. -- Dan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 7, 2006 Report Share Posted July 7, 2006 > So, this " he " that is finishing this statment by typing the last > letter, isn't the same as the " he " that started the sentence -- let > alone commenting successfuly as a continuing " he " about " you " as a > continuing " you " and what you are supposedly doing. > > -- Dan Dan, You seem to identify with that which is changing. Don't do that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 8, 2006 Report Share Posted July 8, 2006 Nisargadatta , " Richard " <richarkar wrote: > > > So, this " he " that is finishing this statment by typing the last > > letter, isn't the same as the " he " that started the sentence -- let > > alone commenting successfuly as a continuing " he " about " you " as a > > continuing " you " and what you are supposedly doing. > > > > -- Dan > > Dan, > > You seem to identify with that which is changing. Don't do that. You're misunderstanding me, Richard. There would have to be a self-existent someone to do the identifying. Otherwise, identifying or not identifying isn't an issue. -- D. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.