Guest guest Posted July 12, 2006 Report Share Posted July 12, 2006 Hi, I'd like to get some clarity about a " word " not referring to a " thing. " Here's my present understanding this matter. I can easily see that the word " fire " isn't the actual " hot stuff " that burns; and the word " water " is not the " wet stuff " you can drink, and so on. Yet it seems to me that the word " fire " does point to, or refer to the " hot stuff " which is not a separate *thing* or independently existing object, but is a process or aspect of the functioning of *totality* for lack of a better word. Am I missing something? Thanks! Michael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.