Guest guest Posted July 13, 2006 Report Share Posted July 13, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033 a écrit : > > > Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " > > <pliantheart@> > > wrote: > > > > > > What Neo-Advaita gives in fact boils down to the > > seductive formula > > > that " there is nothing you can do or need to do, > > all you have to > > > know is that there is no one there. " ... > > > > > > - Alan Adam Jacobs > > > > The error in this formula is that it artificially > > divides knowing from > > doing. > > > > Knowing, as spoken of here, is a doing. > > > > If you are knowing something, you are retaining it, > > which is a doing. > > > > If you speak spontaneously in a context as it > > presents, you will say > > what is adequate to the moment. You won't assume > > some formula (e.g., > > " there is no one here " ) is the adequate truth > > statement covering all > > moments. > > > > There isn't such a truth statement, never has been. > > > > The truth is what is, not what can be retained about > > it through a > > cognitive formula (including a formula like " the > > truth is what is. " ) > > > > -- Dan > > so knowing is of time, > and truth isn`t of time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Truth is relevant only within time and the subject-object dicotomy. toombaru Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.