RE : whats the purpose in fighting with words../iietsa

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart

wrote:

>

> <snip>

>

> > > > >

> > > > from whole seeing no word are superior to any other word...

> > > > from point of views some words are higher than other words...

> > > > the search for the highest word...indicates that you take

> > yourself

> > > > to be what you are not...

> > > > you are the highest nature so to speak.....and words are

mere

> > > > shadows on the wall....

> > > > be who you are...and the wall will disolve..

> > > > ...iietsa

> > > >

> > >

> > > What Is includes words... there is no separation between

> > > words and " what is real " ...

> > >

> > > the notion of some things as " shadows " , is a notion

> > > of separation, a notion of what is real and what isn't...

> > >

> > > there seems to be a tendency by many to put words and

> > > so-called concepts on one plane and what is " referred to "

> > > on another. Why do that?

> > >

> > >

> > > Bill

> > >

> >

> > hey Bill

> > the mind is only thought...

> > and thought however beautyful is mere shadow...

> > within the love of real beauty...

> > differencies in objects are many..but created by the one and

same

> > mind..

> > mind is not the whole...

> > the mind is one...making many...

> > many is in the mind...

> > mind is in the one...

> > the one is the whole...

> > ...iietsa

> >

>

> so you are saying it is important to distinguish

> " mind " from " the one " ?

>

> Bill

>

the one is not a thing (it is what you are) and cannot be known from

elsewhere ...

the mind is a thing in the one (in you) and can easely be seen by

the one (by you)

it cannot be said that the one is separated from the mind because

the one is not a thing...you are not a thing...

....iietsa