Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nisargadatta , OConnor Patricia <gdtige wrote: > > > --- dan330033 <dan330033 a écrit : > > > Nisargadatta , OConnor > > Patricia <gdtige@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey Anna -- > > > > > > > > > > > > There isn't any " after enlightenment " -- > > > > > > > > > > > > except as an idea to make people feel > > special > > > > about themselves. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > well danny boy, two things: yes, you are > > right > > > > and yes, you are > > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > so be it. > > > > > > > > > > ;-) > > > > > > > > Right and wrong isn't what this is about Ana. > > > > > > > > Nor is there any specialness available. > > > > > > > > Clearly, dropping self-constructed illusions and > > > > deceptions isn't > > > > going to be attractive. > > > > > > > > There's nothing in it for " me. " > > > > > > > > No wonderful feelings, no spiritual experiences, > > no > > > > great insights. > > > > > > > > Just releasing, in and of itself. > > > > > > > > -- Dan > > > > > > if there wasn`t wonder in releasing, would there > > be a > > > let go of Dan??? > > > Or maybe wonder isn`t the right word, but since > > there > > > are no right words.... > > > > > > Patricia > > > > from my perspective, the release is automatic, > > simply when it is time. > > > > when " holding " is, literally, impossible. > > > > as long as " holding " seems possible to continue, the > > attempt continues. > > > > I can't release, in order to get a result, like > > wonder, love, or awe. > > > > That is because " I " am what is released, and there > > is nothing in it > > for " me. " > > > > -- Dan > > good, i like that. > Still, is it taboo to talk about a process involving > time, > about a situation (self-created) that is so unbearable > that one let go? > About a death that has a begining and yet no end? > > Patricia > > > > > > > > >I only want to know how you yourself are feeling. Please do not talk to me about no-self, nor about abstract situations. So that I may feel your love and offer mine in return. I am no longer interested in the semantics of being an island. If you suffer, open the door to love in love. If you do not suffer, why list, why anything? Listing, being, is suffering, anyone who denies this is suffering too much to admit it. Love is beautiful suffering in hope of healing transformation though another, is it not? No one is beyond hope, beauty, transformation, the longing for another to love and be loved. ~*~ > > _________________________ > Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! > Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. > http://fr.answers. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.