RE : whats the purpose in fighting with words../iietsa

[Guest guest]

<snip>

 

> > > >

> > > the one is not a thing (it is what you are) and cannot be known

> from

> > > elsewhere ...

> > > the mind is a thing in the one (in you) and can easely be seen

> by

> > > the one (by you)

> > > it cannot be said that the one is separated from the mind

> because

> > > the one is not a thing...you are not a thing...

> > > ...iietsa

> >

> > but my point was that you seem to be making

> > a distinction of " the mind " as an important distinction.

> >

> > I see no such distinction.

> >

> > Is it your view to see some things as " of mind " and

> > some as not? It seems you must be, else you wouldn't

> > be emphasizing mind as a significant distinction.

> >

> > Bill

> >

> mind you can see...all its creations you can see...

> but the one that sees the mind is not a mind-product

> this one so to speek you can only be...

> you are the one...the open door...but sometimes there are

> emphasizing the closed door (mind)...and thats in a way a going

away

> from your true Self (openness)

> ...iietsa

>

 

I don't see all those creations of mind that you refer to.

 

There is just What Is, so very alive.

 

Creations of mind are non-existent in Now.

 

If you are seeing creations of mind then you are not in Now.

 

Bill