RE : whats the purpose in fighting with words../iietsa

[Guest guest]

Nisargadatta , " pliantheart " <pliantheart

wrote:

>

> <snip>

>

> > > > >

> > > > the one is not a thing (it is what you are) and cannot be

known

> > from

> > > > elsewhere ...

> > > > the mind is a thing in the one (in you) and can easely be

seen

> > by

> > > > the one (by you)

> > > > it cannot be said that the one is separated from the mind

> > because

> > > > the one is not a thing...you are not a thing...

> > > > ...iietsa

> > >

> > > but my point was that you seem to be making

> > > a distinction of " the mind " as an important distinction.

> > >

> > > I see no such distinction.

> > >

> > > Is it your view to see some things as " of mind " and

> > > some as not? It seems you must be, else you wouldn't

> > > be emphasizing mind as a significant distinction.

> > >

> > > Bill

> > >

> > mind you can see...all its creations you can see...

> > but the one that sees the mind is not a mind-product

> > this one so to speek you can only be...

> > you are the one...the open door...but sometimes there are

> > emphasizing the closed door (mind)...and thats in a way a going

> away

> > from your true Self (openness)

> > ...iietsa

> >

>

> I don't see all those creations of mind that you refer to.

>

> There is just What Is, so very alive.

>

> Creations of mind are non-existent in Now.

>

> If you are seeing creations of mind then you are not in Now.

>

> Bill

>

" If you are seeing creations of mind then you are not in Now. "

.....is this a creation of the mind or what...

 

.....you dont see all those creations of the mind...

at least you are honest about that...

....iietsa