Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

A Man Wept

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I'm a novice when it comes to the tweaked, re-tweaked, ad infinitum

Bible, and it seems to me that the shortest verse in it is either " And

Jesus Wept " or " Jesus Wept " .

> :-)

>

> Michael

> Adamson

>

actually a topic in wikipedia:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_wept

 

Suffering, weeping, sin, repentance and redemption

are central to Christianity as it is today. Suffering

as a way of salvation ( Judy's way.) That's why

the Nestorians, who claimed Jesus only appeared

to be a man, but was always only spirit, were

declared heretics. To denied the hypostatic union

(Christ both as man and God) was to deny the

possibility of his suffering; therefore, making his

crucifixion only a sham. So, of course, it's important

that Jesus is seen grieving and weeping for a dead

friend. Could not he, if he was God not only

resuscitate Lazarus, but eliminate death itself for all?

 

If he could not, he was not omnipotent; if he could

and would not, then, either death is good, or he

wasn't good. In either case, his weeping was for show.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5 wrote:

>

> I'm a novice when it comes to the tweaked, re-tweaked, ad infinitum

> Bible, and it seems to me that the shortest verse in it is either " And

> Jesus Wept " or " Jesus Wept " .

> > :-)

> >

> > Michael

> > Adamson@

> >

> actually a topic in wikipedia:

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_wept

>

> Suffering, weeping, sin, repentance and redemption

> are central to Christianity as it is today. Suffering

> as a way of salvation ( Judy's way.) That's why

> the Nestorians, who claimed Jesus only appeared

> to be a man, but was always only spirit, were

> declared heretics. To denied the hypostatic union

> (Christ both as man and God) was to deny the

> possibility of his suffering; therefore, making his

> crucifixion only a sham. So, of course, it's important

> that Jesus is seen grieving and weeping for a dead

> friend. Could not he, if he was God not only

> resuscitate Lazarus, but eliminate death itself for all?

>

> If he could not, he was not omnipotent; if he could

> and would not, then, either death is good, or he

> wasn't good. In either case, his weeping was for show.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> >

> > I'm a novice when it comes to the tweaked, re-tweaked, ad infinitum

> > Bible, and it seems to me that the shortest verse in it is

either " And

> > Jesus Wept " or " Jesus Wept " .

> > > :-)

> > >

> > > Michael

> > > Adamson@

> > >

> > actually a topic in wikipedia:

> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_wept

> >

> > Suffering, weeping, sin, repentance and redemption

> > are central to Christianity as it is today. Suffering

> > as a way of salvation ( Judy's way.) That's why

> > the Nestorians, who claimed Jesus only appeared

> > to be a man, but was always only spirit, were

> > declared heretics. To denied the hypostatic union

> > (Christ both as man and God) was to deny the

> > possibility of his suffering; therefore, making his

> > crucifixion only a sham. So, of course, it's important

> > that Jesus is seen grieving and weeping for a dead

> > friend. Could not he, if he was God not only

> > resuscitate Lazarus, but eliminate death itself for all?

> >

> > If he could not, he was not omnipotent; if he could

> > and would not, then, either death is good, or he

> > wasn't good. In either case, his weeping was for show.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Nisargadatta , " toombaru2006 " <lastrain wrote:

>

> Nisargadatta , " skywhilds " <skywords@> wrote:

> >

> > Nisargadatta , Pete S <pedsie5@> wrote:

> > >

> > > I'm a novice when it comes to the tweaked, re-tweaked, ad

infinitum

> > > Bible, and it seems to me that the shortest verse in it is

> either " And

> > > Jesus Wept " or " Jesus Wept " .

> > > > :-)

> > > >

> > > > Michael

> > > > Adamson@

> > > >

> > > actually a topic in wikipedia:

> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesus_wept

> > >

> > > Suffering, weeping, sin, repentance and redemption

> > > are central to Christianity as it is today. Suffering

> > > as a way of salvation ( Judy's way.) That's why

> > > the Nestorians, who claimed Jesus only appeared

> > > to be a man, but was always only spirit, were

> > > declared heretics. To denied the hypostatic union

> > > (Christ both as man and God) was to deny the

> > > possibility of his suffering; therefore, making his

> > > crucifixion only a sham. So, of course, it's important

> > > that Jesus is seen grieving and weeping for a dead

> > > friend. Could not he, if he was God not only

> > > resuscitate Lazarus, but eliminate death itself for all?

> > >

> > > If he could not, he was not omnipotent; if he could

> > > and would not, then, either death is good, or he

> > > wasn't good. In either case, his weeping was for show.

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...