Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 --- pliantheart <pliantheart a écrit : > <snip> > > > > P.P.S.: OK, in a word: Am I projecting when I > see attachment to > > > detachment? I don't think so. There's the > masculine version and > > > there's the feminine version. There's the > sage's version, and > > there's > > > the novice's version. Each feeds the other. > > > > > > Love is neither attached nor detached. Right? > > > > > only let thy own door totaly open... > > and nothing whatsoever (neither attached nor > detached)... > > will never touch you... > > openness is love... > > love is openness... > > all is in you... > > ...iietsa > > > > yes > love = openness = vulnerability = What Is > > and bottom line that is all that matters > > I prefer the word vulnerability to the other two. > > the word love is pretty much meaningless in my view > with all the overloaded meanings piled on it (sorry > Ana)... > much like the word God > > no one *has* love > no one *gives* love > > > Bill you two said the same thing and it echoes with my a.m glimpse: Opened to Light, Open to Life, entirely, Heart and mind opened to All. Opened to the soundless sound. ...What a joy life is when emptiness takes over... Wish you a very very day. ...Patricia > > > > > _________________________ Découvrez un nouveau moyen de poser toutes vos questions quelque soit le sujet ! Questions/Réponses pour partager vos connaissances, vos opinions et vos expériences. http://fr.answers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.